Digital Domain Media Group and CORE Media Group to Create Virtual Elvis Presley

[vivaelvis]

What some fail to see is that anytime they make announcements like this it is keeping his name in the news. Thus makes him relevant again. How many other dead artists are getting that type of attention? None. Not even Michael Jackson, who's fans claimed that he would be bigger in death than Elvis is now. We have to remember that Elvis is dead and never coming back. But through these technologies he is able to remain with us. And we also have to remember that these new developments and projects, such as the upcoming 4D film that is currently showing in Asia called Elvis Rocks, are NOT aimed at us old timers and are meant to hook in newer younger fans. Lilo & Stitch was big in doing that in 2002. A Little Less Conversation remix is now considered a classic and hooked in many new young fans who now are in their 20's and 30's. So, it's pretty obvious that the upcoming hologram or 4D projects will do the same.

[King Of The Whole World]

Tasteful and true to Elvis is all I care about.

[Jumpsuit Junkie]

What some fail to see is that anytime they make announcements like this it is keeping his name in the news. Thus makes him relevant again. How many other dead artists are getting that type of attention? None. Not even Michael Jackson, who's fans claimed that he would be bigger in death than Elvis is now. We have to remember that Elvis is dead and never coming back. But through these technologies he is able to remain with us. And we also have to remember that these new developments and projects, such as the upcoming 4D film that is currently showing in Asia called Elvis Rocks, are NOT aimed at us old timers and are meant to hook in newer younger fans. Lilo & Stitch was big in doing that in 2002. A Little Less Conversation remix is now considered a classic and hooked in many new young fans who now are in their 20's and 30's. So, it's pretty obvious that the upcoming hologram or 4D projects will do the same.

What some fail to grasp is that each time some big wig decides to use state of the art technology there is a danger that we dilute the original artist. Progress for progresses sake doesn't mean a better product! There is a danger the gateway technology is inferior and damages Elvis rather than enhances. Just because its bright, sparkly and new doesn't make it better.

An Image of Elvis is an Image of Elvis, not the real thing. As Elvis once said ' The Image is one thing, the human being is another'. What this hologram might represent is a shallow representation of the original, what might the creators do to make Elvis relevant, might go against his own personal wishes. I know the idiom that no 'publicity is bad publicity' and to a certain extent that is true, but once you have damaged the legacy, it can take decades to repair.

To me at least, I wait with guarded anticipation, that whatever new fad that is around the corner adds to Elvis' rich legacy. I suppose that's what older mature adults are able to do

[debtdbruno]

What some fail to grasp is that each time some big wig decides to use state of the art technology there is a danger that we dilute the original artist. Progress for progresses sake doesn't mean a better product! There is a danger the gateway technology is inferior and damages Elvis rather than enhances. Just because its bright, sparkly and new doesn't make it better.

An Image of Elvis is an Image of Elvis, not the real thing. As Elvis once said ' The Image is one thing, the human being is another'. What this hologram might represent is a shallow representation of the original, what might the creators do to make Elvis relevant, might go against his own personal wishes. I know the idiom that no 'publicity is bad publicity' and to a certain extent that is true, but once you have damaged the legacy, it can take decades to repair.

To me at least, I wait with guarded anticipation, that whatever new fad that is around the corner adds to Elvis' rich legacy. I suppose that's what older mature adults are able to do

its a tough one, I can what you and vivaelvis are saying

[Nicole Presley]

If you have seen the video, then you should know that the Elvis image was a special effect which was added in later.

You´re right. I just watched it again. And it really says he was added later. I must have overheard that the last time I watched. But I still hope if the make a hologram it will look like that.

[KPM]

What some fail to grasp is that each time some big wig decides to use state of the art technology there is a danger that we dilute the original artist. Progress for progresses sake doesn't mean a better product! There is a danger the gateway technology is inferior and damages Elvis rather than enhances. Just because its bright, sparkly and new doesn't make it better.

An Image of Elvis is an Image of Elvis, not the real thing. As Elvis once said ' The Image is one thing, the human being is another'. What this hologram might represent is a shallow representation of the original, what might the creators do to make Elvis relevant, might go against his own personal wishes. I know the idiom that no 'publicity is bad publicity' and to a certain extent that is true, but once you have damaged the legacy, it can take decades to repair.

To me at least, I wait with guarded anticipation, that whatever new fad that is around the corner adds to Elvis' rich legacy. I suppose that's what older mature adults are able to do

Mature thinking my friend, agree 100%

[vivaelvis]

What some fail to grasp is that each time some big wig decides to use state of the art technology there is a danger that we dilute the original artist. Progress for progresses sake doesn't mean a better product! There is a danger the gateway technology is inferior and damages Elvis rather than enhances. Just because its bright, sparkly and new doesn't make it better.

An Image of Elvis is an Image of Elvis, not the real thing. As Elvis once said ' The Image is one thing, the human being is another'. What this hologram might represent is a shallow representation of the original, what might the creators do to make Elvis relevant, might go against his own personal wishes. I know the idiom that no 'publicity is bad publicity' and to a certain extent that is true, but once you have damaged the legacy, it can take decades to repair.

To me at least, I wait with guarded anticipation, that whatever new fad that is around the corner adds to Elvis' rich legacy. I suppose that's what older mature adults are able to do

How can a hologram damage the legacy? It can't. All it can do is give people a glimpse of what once was. Just as the Tupac 2D hologram attempt did. Damaging a legacy would have to be something discovered or verbally said, like the made up shoeshine comment or someone around him claiming that he was anti-American in private. Those are the things that can damage a legacy. Not some fake hologram, which people already know to begin with that it is not actually real.

[JRtherealJR]

I'm very interested in your opinion. What do you think virtual Elvis is about? How will it work? What will it look like? I can't wait to read your reply

A lot of people are assuming that this "virtual" Elvis will be the star of some sort of stage show or concert tour- but let's remind ourselves that the announcement states that it will be used for "a range of entertainment projects" which could mean anything- "Elvis" unveiling a new car at a motor show, "Elvis" at trade shows endorsing products, "Elvis" making guest appearances in Vegas magic shows; all very dissappointing options for those people who are looking forward to a holographic Elvis world tour.

So let's not get our hopes up too quickly.

What I probably will not want to see is a fully CGI Elvis- like the recent Tupac "hologram". I do not want to see what is to all intents and purposes a cartoon Elvis- no matter how convincing it may look. It will still be someone else's interpretation of Elvis- and to me that will be an Elvis who has no soul.

Why do they need to make a CGI Elvis anyway? Unless it is to make him sing different songs which he never sung in life. The idea just doesn't seem very exciting.

Enough footage exists of the real Elvis to make a true 2D reflection show. I am thinking here particularly of all the TTWII footage which is:
1- in HD
2- full-body length footage from head to toe

The concept of the Elvis In Concert video show was to present an authentic as possible Elvis Prelsey Concert- this is what I want to see!

They now have the opportunity to take the current video show to the next level by adding in a 2D reflection of Elvis for most (or all) of the show while still keeping the video screens and live band.

[vivaelvis]

A lot of people are assuming this "virtual" Elvis will be the star of some sort of stage show or concert tour- but let's remind ourselves that the announcement states that it will be used for "a range of entertainment projects" which could mean anything- "Elvis" unveiling a new car at a motor show, "Elvis" at trade shows endorsing products, "Elvis" making guest appearances in Vegas magic shows; all very dissappointing options for those people who are looking forward to a holographic Elvis world tour.

So let's not get our hopes up too quickly.

What I probably will not want to see is a fully CGI Elvis- like the recent Tupac hologram. I do not want to see what is to all intents and purposes a cartoon Elvis- no matter how convincing it may look. It will still be someone else's interpretation of Elvis- and to me that will be an Elvis who has no soul.

Why do they need to make a CGI Elvis anyway? Unless it is to make him sing different songs which he never sung in life. The idea just doesn't seem very exciting.

Enough footage exists of the real Elvis to make a true 2D reflection show. I am thinking here particularly of all the TTWII footage which is:
1- in HD
2- full-body length footage from head to toe

The concept of the Elvis In Concert video show was to present an authentic as possible Elvis Prelsey Concert- this is what I want to see!

They now have the opportunity to take it to the next level by adding in a 2D reflection of Elvis for most (or all) of the show while still keeping the video screens and live band.

That would mean no more use for fake impersonators. So it's a good thing IMO.

[JRtherealJR]

That would mean no more use for fake impersonators. So it's a good thing IMO.

Oh wow, that's really funny coming from someone who thinks Harem Holiday is Elvis' most inspirational album.

[vivaelvis]

Oh wow, that's really funny coming from someone who thinks Harem Holiday is Elvis' most inspirational album.

Um, excuse me. Where have I said that?

[vivaelvis]

Speaking of the hologram announcement. There's also word that Marilyn Monroe is also getting the same kind of treatment. A couple years ago, Star Wars creator, George Lucas got rights to use both Elvis and Marilyn's image in a new movie format. Now we get this news. Something MIGHT be in the works to bring these two world icons back to the silver screen together! How cool would that be?!

[King Of The Whole World]

I just really worry if this hologram stuff is not done correctly, Elvis will be even more of a joke to people. I keep reading in comments, are they going to use fat or thin Elvis. Oh how funny and creative. I just think a lot of this stuff will do more harm than good. I saw where an article was talking about putting Elvis with Tupac or something. That is something Elvis would not like, Tupac was a thug, not Elvis.

[vivaelvis]

I just really worry if this hologram stuff is not done correctly, Elvis will be even more of a joke to people. I keep reading in comments, are they going to use fat or thin Elvis. Oh how funny and creative. I just think a lot of this stuff will do more harm than good. I saw where an article was talking about putting Elvis with Tupac or something. That is something Elvis would not like, Tupac was a thug, not Elvis.

I understand concern, but do not think it's anything to worry about. If anything, it will bring more attention to Elvis and show the world what he was really all about. And I don't know for sure if it will be the same development that we saw with Tupac.

But to call Tupac a thug and not Elvis is not fair. The word "thug" is heavily misinterpreted in society today. It used to mean a a violent person. But the meaning today is of a depressed broke person who feels he has no way in life or society. We all know that Elvis struggled throughout life with depression and loneliness, as to feel unwanted and broken at times, despite rich as hell. Elvis was also known to be violent at times. So, in a way, Elvis was too a Thug. If I'm not mistaken, the harsh critics once referred to him as a thug in the media back in the 50's.

[Snake Eyes]

A lot of people are assuming that this "virtual" Elvis will be the star of some sort of stage show or concert tour- but let's remind ourselves that the announcement states that it will be used for "a range of entertainment projects" which could mean anything- "Elvis" unveiling a new car at a motor show, "Elvis" at trade shows endorsing products, "Elvis" making guest appearances in Vegas magic shows; all very dissappointing options for those people who are looking forward to a holographic Elvis world tour.

So let's not get our hopes up too quickly.

What I probably will not want to see is a fully CGI Elvis- like the recent Tupac "hologram". I do not want to see what is to all intents and purposes a cartoon Elvis- no matter how convincing it may look. It will still be someone else's interpretation of Elvis- and to me that will be an Elvis who has no soul.

Why do they need to make a CGI Elvis anyway? Unless it is to make him sing different songs which he never sung in life. The idea just doesn't seem very exciting.

Enough footage exists of the real Elvis to make a true 2D reflection show. I am thinking here particularly of all the TTWII footage which is:
1- in HD
2- full-body length footage from head to toe

The concept of the Elvis In Concert video show was to present an authentic as possible Elvis Prelsey Concert- this is what I want to see!

They now have the opportunity to take the current video show to the next level by adding in a 2D reflection of Elvis for most (or all) of the show while still keeping the video screens and live band.

Maybe we are all jumping the gun, but I got the impression that EPE wanted to ignite some fire into the touring side. Some sites have suggested that the current on tour program will be scrapped to make way for a new show. Who knows? I don't want to see Elvis in comedy shows or crap like that, I want to see a "live" show. There is enough footage to make this happen, God I don't want to be disappointed. Until we all know the real intentions, we can speculate and debate all day long.

[King Of The Whole World]

I understand concern, but do not think it's anything to worry about. If anything, it will bring more attention to Elvis and show the world what he was really all about. And I don't know for sure if it will be the same development that we saw with Tupac.

But to call Tupac a thug and not Elvis is not fair. The word "thug" is heavily misinterpreted in society today. It used to mean a a violent person. But the meaning today is of a depressed broke person who feels he has no way in life or society. We all know that Elvis struggled throughout life with depression and loneliness, as to feel unwanted and broken at times, despite rich as hell. Elvis was also known to be violent at times. So, in a way, Elvis was too a Thug. If I'm not mistaken, the harsh critics once referred to him as a thug in the media back in the 50's.

I don't think so. This doesn't sound like Elvis to me...A thug to me is a person who steals, murders for a so called "gang"

noun
1. a cruel or vicious ruffian, robber, or murderer.

2. ( sometimes initial capital letter ) one of a former group of professional robbers and murderers in India who strangled their victims.

[vivaelvis]

Maybe we are all jumping the gun, but I got the impression that EPE wanted to ignite some fire into the touring side. Some sites have suggested that the current on tour program will be scrapped to make way for a new show. Who knows? I don't want to see Elvis in comedy shows or crap like that, I want to see a "live" show. There is enough footage to make this happen, God I don't want to be disappointed. Until we all know the real intentions, we can speculate and debate all day long.

The more I think about it the more I feel a world tour of a virtual hologram (or close to it) tour is a few years away if ever. For one thing, the cost for a show would be astronomical. And we all know that EPE doesn't even have money to invest into Graceland without a backer. I am seeing and hearing more about Elvis on film than I am on tour in holographic fashion. Which may in the long run, draw in more fans that way than a tour that everyone will know from the start isn't really him.

[King Of The Whole World]

Maybe we are all jumping the gun, but I got the impression that EPE wanted to ignite some fire into the touring side. Some sites have suggested that the current on tour program will be scrapped to make way for a new show. Who knows? I don't want to see Elvis in comedy shows or crap like that, I want to see a "live" show. There is enough footage to make this happen, God I don't want to be disappointed. Until we all know the real intentions, we can speculate and debate all day long.

Me too my friend.

[vivaelvis]

I don't think so. This doesn't sound like Elvis to me...A thug to me is a person who steals, murders for a so called "gang"

noun
1. a cruel or vicious ruffian, robber, or murderer.

2. ( sometimes initial capital letter ) one of a former group of professional robbers and murderers in India who strangled their victims.

This is from the Urabn dictionary of what the word means today.

1. Thug
As Tupac defined it, a thug is someone who is going through struggles, has gone through struggles, and continues to live day by day with nothing for them. That person is a thug. and the life they are living is the thug life. A thug is NOT a gangster. Look up gangster and gangsta. Not even CLOSE, my friend.

4. thug
Someone who had nothing, and was nothing, and became something.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thug

4 desribes Elvis to a T.

[KPM]

The more I think about it the more I feel a world tour of a virtual hologram (or close to it) tour is a few years away if ever. For one thing, the cost for a show would be astronomical. And we all know that EPE doesn't even have money to invest into Graceland without a backer. I am seeing and hearing more about Elvis on film than I am on tour in holographic fashion. Which may in the long run, draw in more fans that way than a tour that everyone will know from the start isn't really him.

Keep thinking about it.....