Logic says it would seem highly unlikely that Giorgio was not in some way shape or form involved in the Commission considering her book and information are sited many many times. IF the Commission really did indepth probing-would not Giorgio be someone that would be consulted, as to how where and from whom all this "knowledge" came about?
.....but also with logic in view and knowing that any publicity helps sales or deals....... what better way to help keep the controversy going, and projects like her book and all its related projects fresh and profitable-than to work with the Commission which was supposedly investigating many of the claims that she made in her book...................
Mystery upon mystery???? IMO not about the death, but about who is involved in keeping this tabloid laced idea going such as this Commission, which is now disbanded... its conclusions just never really amounted to real proof-other than circumstantial evidence which when framed properly without any specifics, or names makes some people doubt...but which I will again say would be laughed out of any court room in America.
I do not want to change anyones mind, as you point out that is up to each individual but I will always make sure that the premise is shown to be nothing more than circumstantial, speculative, tid bits which have little solid evidence. Honestly if any real hard evidence were present this would have been gone into long ago and not by a self appointed group of people whos interests in the outcome.....can be viewed as suspect given that they will not even identify themselves beyond the "shadows"
In connection to this mystery of "who and why" let me repost what Enders investigation concluded using the well known method of "content analysis":
........Earlier this year I was asked to undertake a content analysis of postings on several Elvis "underground" messageboards. Content analysis is a quantitative research application that classifies textual material by reducing it to more relevant, manageable bits of data. It can allow the researcher to identify postings that, in all likelihood, were made by one person using different aliases. Some readers will be familiar with the use of content analysis in revealing the authors of infamous publications like "The Hitler Diaries". My analysis specifically sought to identify similar patterns of spelling, grammar, punctuation, style and sentence/paragraph structure in messageboard postings.
I concluded that at least two prominent members (who shall remain nameless) of the Elvis underground community were posting under different aliases. There appeared to be a dual purpose to their strategy: support their own arguments (it always helps if others concur with your beliefs - the "safety in numbers" philosophy) and generate debate among believers (a good conspiracy needs to burn brightly).