Reply With Quote
I have also heard that whats left of the Beatles catalogue in his estate-may go to Paul McCartney because MJ had been saying he was going to change his will and leave it to him. Boy would that put a fly in the ointment.Originally Posted by utmom2008
This article is very interesting, it states that neither MJ nor Debbie Rowe are the biological parents of the oldest 2 children. It also says that MJ never filed the correct paperwork to legally adopt them. I've also been hearing that his will is many many years old, done prior to the birth of these kids. What a mess he has obviously created!
updated 55 minutes ago
LOS ANGELES - Less than a week after Michael Jackson’s sudden death, multiple reports have surfaced claiming that Michael Jackson is not the biological father of any of his children. One report also states that ex-wife Debbie Rowe is also not the biological mother of the two of the singer’s children to which she gave birth.
According to a report in Us Weekly, multiple sources claim to the mag that Jackson’s dermatologist (and Debbie Rowe’s former boss), Arnold Klein, is the biological father to Prince Michael, 12, Paris, 11.
“He is the dad,” a Jackson source claimed. “He and Debbie signed an agreement saying they would never reveal the truth.”
Story continues below ↓advertisement | your ad here
When contacted by Us Weekly, Klein would not comment.
Access Hollywood spoke with Klein’s publicist who confirmed that Klein was a very close friend of Jackson’s for 20 years. The publicist said that Klein is grieving right now, and that his attorney will not let him speak until the dust settles and the coroner’s report comes out.
According to a report by TMZ.com, the Jackson children’s biological family tree is actually even more of a mystery. The Web site claims that in addition to not fathering his two eldest children, that Jackson did not father his youngest, Prince Michael II, 7, either. TMZ also claims that Rowe is not biological mother of Prince Michael and Paris.
According to multiple TMZ sources, all three Jackson children, “were conceived in vitro — outside the womb,” using a sperm donor and that Rowe’s eggs were not used. The Web site claims she was used as a surrogate and paid well for carrying the children.
As for Prince Michael II, TMZ reported the surrogate that Jackson used was not told to whom the baby she was carrying would go. Three days after the baby was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, a lawyer for Jackson reportedly picked up the baby and delivered the newborn to the singer.
TMZ has also reported that it is not known if Jackson selected the donors himself or if he was unaware of whose sperm and egg was being used. The site goes on to claim that documents do exist outlining all of the arrangements surrounding the births of all three children.
In addition to claiming that neither Jackson nor Rowe are biological parents to the three children, TMZ also claims that Jackson never filed the paperwork necessary to adopt the children.
More from Access Hollywood
seems MJ did leave a will back in 2002 he made one..leaving everything to his mom 
[
yeah this mj was one messed up dude
]
