Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 112

Thread: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

  1. #21

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by ehollier View Post
    WOW Brian, I didn't think you could say anything positive about Elvis. I'm impressed.
    that's actually not true

    I'm misunderstood

  2. #22

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian View Post
    that's actually not true

    I'm misunderstood
    Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot. You were just JOKING!!!!!!
    "More people today should see him not simply as a performer, but as an artist with a great soul."

    John Bakke, professor emeritus
    University of Memphis

  3. #23

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by ehollier View Post
    Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot. You were just JOKING!!!!!!

    I'm not joking

    everything I've said about Elvis in this thread is just 100% factual and true

    I think my opinion on Buddy Holly is a great one

  4. #24
    Down In The Alley shelley.m.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    The Great White North.
    Posts
    2,646

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Elvis "kicked" open the door for other white Rock artists in the 50's.
    The One and Only King of Rock'n'Roll.

  5. #25

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian View Post
    I think if Buddy Holly had lived he wouldn't of had this great career with a bunch of hits like so many people have speculated.

    even his last few singles released before he died weren't charting all that high and it seemed he was moving away from rock n'' roll

    I think Buddy Holly would've had a few more hits going into the 60's
    his band member Sonny Curtis wrote ''I fought the Law'' in the early 60's so I can see Buddy recording that before Bobby Fuller.

    I do think Buddy just like all the 50's rock n'' rollers would have been blown away by the Beatles and the British Invasion and just like that Holly's hit making days would've been over.

    I do see Buddy continuing to record albums and experiment with his music but none of this music would sell.

    I basically see Holly doing rock n'' roll oldies tours with Chuck Berry, Little Richard and Fats Domino.


    To Elvis credit he's the only one of the 50's original rockers to have continued success in the 60's and 70's and the only one to survive the British invasion.

    Elvis had something like 114 top 40 hits throughout his career and numerous hit albums. If you were to combine the record sales of Little Richrd, Chuck Berry, Fats Domino, Jerry Lee Lewis, The Everly brothers, Bo Diddley and Buddy Holly Elvis outsells them all with a lot left over.
    We'll never know.

  6. #26

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    I like Elvis more than Buddy: looks, voice, everything. BUt everybody has a different opinion.
    Both gave something especial to music history. Maybe... Elvis had more time.
    Let the stars fade and fall, and I won't care at all, as long as I have you.
    Elvis...

    http://myantiquemusicbox.wordpress.com/
    http://wendy56.wordpress.com/


    "You've got it all together like a lovin' machine
    You're lookin' like glory and walkin' like a dream...
    Mother nature's sure been good to Y-O-U"

    Wendy

  7. #27

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian View Post
    I think my opinion on Buddy Holly is a great one
    .....and misguided.

  8. #28

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by rocknroll View Post
    We'll never know.

    I'm pretty sure that Buddy Holly would've had the same problems the other rock n'' roll pioneers did.

  9. #29

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by rocknroll View Post
    .....and misguided.

    watch it rock n'' roll

    my opinion on this is great

  10. #30
    International Level LtCarman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Queens, New York
    Posts
    519

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Brian, your opinion isn't always the best. As a matter of fact, no one's opinion is the best. An opinion is just an opinion. You can't force it down on others. Same goes for you Rocknroll. Just because you do not agree with Brian, does not give you the right to call him misguided, no matter how much you do not agree with him.

    End of story.

  11. #31

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian View Post
    I'm pretty sure that Buddy Holly would've had the same problems the other rock n'' roll pioneers did.
    You'll never know. I think the facts of his early career point to a different conclusion than the one you come up with.

  12. #32

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian View Post
    watch it rock n'' roll

    my opinion on this is great
    Misguided, not great.

  13. #33
    International Level cbg84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Charlotte NC
    Posts
    505

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by memphis69 View Post
    BUDDY HOLLY DESERVES HIS PLACE IN ROCK N' ROLL HISTORY JUST LIKE ELVIS!!
    Personally most people deserve their place in history. Partical credit may or should go to someone or another but most people got where they are on their own and deserve it.

  14. #34

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by LtCarman View Post
    Brian, your opinion isn't always the best. As a matter of fact, no one's opinion is the best. An opinion is just an opinion. You can't force it down on others. Same goes for you Rocknroll. Just because you do not agree with Brian, does not give you the right to call him misguided, no matter how much you do not agree with him.

    End of story.
    Well I feel so much better now that LTCarmen told me and rocknroll how it is

    Didn't say my opinion was the best it's just great

  15. #35
    International Level LtCarman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Queens, New York
    Posts
    519

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian View Post
    Well I feel so much better now that LTCarmen told me and rocknroll how it is

    Didn't say my opinion was the best it's just great
    Your opinion may be great to you and everybody else that agrees with it, but it may not be great to anybody else that does not agree with it.

    Is it just me or do threads seem to get side tracked more often than not?
    Last edited by LtCarman; 02-03-2009 at 09:06 PM.

  16. #36

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by rocknroll View Post
    Misguided, not great.

    I think your misguided if you think Buddy Holly would've survived the British invasion.

    The other 50's rock n'' roll pioneers were talented to but they fell by the wayside in the mid 60's and I don't see why Holly would've been any different.

  17. #37

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by LtCarman View Post
    Same goes for you Rocknroll. Just because you do not agree with Brian, does not give you the right to call him misguided, no matter how much you do not agree with him.

    End of story.
    Open your eyes, or learn to read. I didn't say Brian was misguided, I said his opinion was. Comprehension not one of your strengths?

    However, you ARE misguided. PM me if you aren't sure what that means.

  18. #38

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian View Post
    that's actually not true

    I'm misunderstood
    What makes you say that?

    franny

  19. #39

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian View Post
    I think your misguided if you think Buddy Holly would've survived the British invasion.

    The other 50's rock n'' roll pioneers were talented to but they fell by the wayside in the mid 60's and I don't see why Holly would've been any different.
    My opinion is he would not only have survived the British Invasion but thrived. Holly was a talented musician, songwriter, producer, performer, etc., etc. It's the ones that were just "entertainers" that didn't survive.

    That's my opinion, and it is the greatest.

  20. #40

    Re: Buddy Holly more important than Elvis???

    Quote Originally Posted by LtCarman View Post
    Your opinion may be great to you and everybody else that agrees with it, but it may not be great to anybody else that does not agree with it.

    Is it just me or do threads seem to get side tracked more often than not?
    Side tracked by you and your weak attempt to tell somebody off.

    Me? I'm still talking about Buddy Holly.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •