Well thats obviously an opinion-that many people did not share or it would have not done so well and got some fairly good press around the world.. I think you and I discussed this once before. I have pointed out I went and saw it in a theater when it came out and it was well received and played about 4 weeks in our area. Money talks-it says people liked the finished product. Now good/bad movie is subjective opinion no matter how you look at it. But real bombs such as "Ishtar" and the $40 million dollar turkey "Heavens Gate" make no money and are panned universally-this is not the case with the 1976 "A Star is Born" I must respectfully point out.
I think I have also in the past pointed out that the movie that "Elvis" would have made with Steisand-would not have been the exact same movie that "Kristofferson" made with BS.
The script went thru revisions after Kristofferson was cast, and so did the music for his part.
This would have been done for Elvis with probably even more care since he was a not just another singer-he was the start of a music revolution and this carries weight..



Reply With Quote
