Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 51

Thread: Lisa Marie Presley - Presley Expecting Boy And Girl?

  1. #21
    Loving elvis
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    7,974
    I agree diane and Unique Dog. I don't see anything revolting about the pictures at all. I wouldn't come close posing in a magazine but if Lisa felt she wanted to do that then l'am behind her 100%.

  2. #22
    Mad Tigers Lindagtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tamaulipas, MEXICO
    Posts
    28
    I agree with you...remember she is Elvis' daughter & as her father she is ORIGINAL and if she wants to proudly show her tummy to the world, it is O.K...as for the names I think we will have to wait & see.

    Congratulations Granpa Elvis!!!!
    "Yesterday is dead and gone, and tomorrow's out of sight, and is sad to be alone, help me make it through the night..."

  3. #23
    TCB Mafia
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,495
    I find this, beautiful.

    Lisa is loving her babies, there is everything right, with that. She won't ever, be able to recreate this time again, so yes, I'm glad she has.

  4. #24
    TCB Mafia beckelvis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    SPAIN
    Posts
    1,700
    If The Story Is True,the Name Special Is Elvis ,for The Tribute To Her Dad

  5. #25
    Cadillac King
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Australia.
    Posts
    344
    We'll have to wait and see, if true ?...Wonderful news !!!

  6. #26
    Down In The Alley shelley.m.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    The Great White North.
    Posts
    2,647
    We'll just have to wait and see if Lisa names her twins Jesse and Gladys.It would be nice if she did.
    The One and Only King of Rock'n'Roll.

  7. #27

    .

    Quote Originally Posted by Unique Dog View Post
    What is so revolting about it???
    Her pregnant belly hanging out for all and sundry to see, for one!

    The woman should have some decorum and some class. What on earth is the point of this photo anyway?

    I am certainly no prude (ie I have no objection to pornography etc), but we have lost our sense of good taste in society. Why do people feel the need to expose themselves like this?

    It's like when women feel the need to breastfeed in public. "Oh, it's a natural thing", they say.

    Well, yeah, it is. But so is masturbation and defacation ... I just don't need to see these things in the middle of a shopping mall or on a bus!

    And no one needs to see LMP, or any woman for that matter, letting it all hang out like this, especially just for a cheap bit of "artistic" publicity.

    If she wanted photos of her pregnant belly, then she should have kept them private.

    It is undignified in the extreme, and as I said, Elvis would have been mortified.
    Getlo - cute'n'cuddly

  8. #28
    Angel utmom2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    10,021
    Quote Originally Posted by Getlo View Post
    I am certainly no prude (ie I have no objection to pornography etc), but we have lost our sense of good taste in society. Why do people feel the need to expose themselves like this?
    Society has certainly come a long way from the days of Lucy and Ricky Ricardo sleeping in separate twin beds. They also were not allowed to use the word "pregnant" on television. Surely there is a "happy medium" somewhere along the way.

    Quote Originally Posted by getlo View Post
    It's like when women feel the need to breastfeed in public. "Oh, it's a natural thing", they say.
    Well, yeah, it is. But so is masturbation and defacation ... I just don't need to see these things in the middle of a shopping mall or on a bus!

  9. #29

    .

    Quote Originally Posted by utmom2008 View Post
    Society has certainly come a long way from the days of Lucy and Ricky Ricardo sleeping in separate twin beds. They also were not allowed to use the word "pregnant" on television. Surely there is a "happy medium" somewhere along the way.
    I'm fine with all that. I think everything should be openly discussed, even on television with warnings when it's inappropriate for kids. Like I said, I'm fine with pornography, though I don't want to see porn stores on every corner.

    There's too much censorship (the debate in America when Janet Jackson - shock, horror! - exposed most of her breast) was hilarious to the rest of the world. America needs to get proper sex education taught in every school and students can attend with mum and dad's permission.

    But this business of walking about with pregnant bellies hanging out (LMP) or where celebrities feel the need to discuss each and every one of the personal, spiritual and sexual problems ... I find it offensive. Some things should be left to the imagination.

    Lisa crossed the lines of decency with this photo. No, not sexual decency (there's nothing sexually offensive in the photo) but personal decency, and good taste and decorum.
    Getlo - cute'n'cuddly

  10. #30
    Angel utmom2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    10,021
    Quote Originally Posted by Getlo View Post
    But this business of walking about with pregnant bellies hanging out (LMP) or where celebrities feel the need to discuss each and every one of the personal, spiritual and sexual problems ... I find it offensive. Some things should be left to the imagination.
    I agree with your points. As I said earlier...I never felt sensual or maternal when I could no longer see my feet, or when my husband had to help me get out of the bathtub. No woman could love their children more than I do, but I felt like a beached whale towards the end of my pregnancies. My son was 2 weeks early, he weighed almost 10 lbs. and was 21 inches long. On my 5'5" frame I not only felt like a beached whale...I was sure I looked like one as well. Not everything in life is meant to be shared...and this is one of them, IMO.

  11. #31
    TCB Mafia SweetCaroline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Sacramento foothills
    Posts
    1,351
    Quote Originally Posted by utmom2008 View Post
    [/b]


    I for one can't imagine doing this. I didn't feel like there was alot of grace and dignity left for me when I could no longer see my feet.
    When pregnant I would look in the mirror and cry at my shape changing into watermelon shape ....so there would be no chance I would stand in front of a camera.

    I guess it is a new world that I don't completely understand and it has left me behind.

    I will never forget you Rosanne.
    R.I.P. 4-27-59~7-22-09

  12. #32
    Angel utmom2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    10,021
    Quote Originally Posted by SweetCaroline View Post

    I guess it is a new world that I don't completely understand and it has left me behind.
    Agreed Carole! And guess what? There are a few things that I have no wish to be brought up to speed on...and this happens to be one of them.

  13. #33
    International Level
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    South Bend, Indiana
    Posts
    698
    I like that picture of Lisa, to me woman is beauitiful while she is pregnant. So, I don't see anything wrong with it. I think more pregnant women should show off their bodies. But that's just me. LOL

    Love to all,
    Tim

  14. #34
    TCB Mafia
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,495
    That's a lovely thing to say Tim, but that's just you, lol.

  15. #35
    Cadillac King Unique Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by Getlo View Post
    Her pregnant belly hanging out for all and sundry to see, for one!

    The woman should have some decorum and some class. What on earth is the point of this photo anyway?

    I am certainly no prude (ie I have no objection to pornography etc), but we have lost our sense of good taste in society. Why do people feel the need to expose themselves like this?

    It's like when women feel the need to breastfeed in public. "Oh, it's a natural thing", they say.

    Well, yeah, it is. But so is masturbation and defacation ... I just don't need to see these things in the middle of a shopping mall or on a bus!

    And no one needs to see LMP, or any woman for that matter, letting it all hang out like this, especially just for a cheap bit of "artistic" publicity.

    If she wanted photos of her pregnant belly, then she should have kept them private.

    It is undignified in the extreme, and as I said, Elvis would have been mortified.


    I beg to differ. I don`t believe it is revolting in the least bit. It was done in good taste...at least she wasn`t on the cover of some mag posing nude like Demi Moore did. THAT was bad taste.
    Last edited by Unique Dog; 08-17-2008 at 09:02 PM.
    Security is not the absence of danger but the presence of God no matter what the danger.

  16. #36

    .

    Quote Originally Posted by Unique Dog View Post
    It was done in good taste...at least she wasn`t on the cover of some mag posing nude like Demi Moore did. THAT was bad taste.
    What is the difference between appearing on a magazine cover and issuing a pregnancy shot like Lisa's via her website and the internet?

    None.

    In both cases, it was unseemly.

    It is far from "good taste" to expose oneself like this publicly, no matter which way it is done.
    Getlo - cute'n'cuddly

  17. #37
    Cadillac King Unique Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    270
    Ok, is it okay for women to model bathing suits in public or in magazines? No. Is it revolting simply because she`s pregnant? She was wearing more clothes than most models wear during a fashion show or most women at the beach for that matter.

    My only question to her would be--- the tabloids compared her to her father during her first two pregnancies too. Why didn`t she pose for photos like this during those pregnancies?
    Security is not the absence of danger but the presence of God no matter what the danger.

  18. #38

    .

    Quote Originally Posted by Unique Dog View Post
    Ok, is it okay for women to model bathing suits in public or in magazines? No.
    Of course it is!

    Quote Originally Posted by Unique Dog View Post
    Is it revolting simply because she`s pregnant?
    Yes. But pregnancy in and of itself is not revolting. Nor is Lisa's pregnancy. Pregnant women are (usually) beautiful. What is revolting is the fact that she's hanging her belly out for cheap publicity. And that she's hanging it out at all. I have no objection to women showing their stomachs when it is appropriate. It is not appropriate during pregnancy. While I don't think pregnant women should be covered up with those old maternity dresses from the old days, some things should be private.

    Quote Originally Posted by Unique Dog View Post
    She was wearing more clothes than most models wear during a fashion show or most women at the beach for that matter.
    Again, it has nothing to do with the amount of clothing she's wearing, or not wearing.

    Put simply: women should not hang their pregnant bellies out for all to see, either in public or in photo shoots. Same as men shouldn't show their arse crack by wearing low cut pants, nor should overweight women wear midriff tops that expose their stomachs or belly rings.

    Lisa lacks modesty. Any women who take shots of their pregnant bellies should not inflict them on the public. Keep it for the father of the kids, or close friends and family.
    Getlo - cute'n'cuddly

  19. #39
    Elvis Presley Blvd Unchained Melody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    in the cold Kentucky rain
    Posts
    7,513
    No need in fighting about it I guess if Lisa wanted to do it then thats her choice. if you don't like it just look the other way..me I really couldnt' care less about such a thing..
    "How do I get placed in situations like this? Ah hell, I guess it's all part of showbusiness "~ Elvis in his limo on his way to perform in Omaha, NE on June 19th 1977


  20. #40
    Cadillac King Unique Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    270
    Getlo, can we agree to disagree on this issue?



    Quote Originally Posted by Getlo View Post
    Of course it is!



    Yes. But pregnancy in and of itself is not revolting. Nor is Lisa's pregnancy. Pregnant women are (usually) beautiful. What is revolting is the fact that she's hanging her belly out for cheap publicity. And that she's hanging it out at all. I have no objection to women showing their stomachs when it is appropriate. It is not appropriate during pregnancy. While I don't think pregnant women should be covered up with those old maternity dresses from the old days, some things should be private.



    Again, it has nothing to do with the amount of clothing she's wearing, or not wearing.

    Put simply: women should not hang their pregnant bellies out for all to see, either in public or in photo shoots. Same as men shouldn't show their arse crack by wearing low cut pants, nor should overweight women wear midriff tops that expose their stomachs or belly rings.

    Lisa lacks modesty. Any women who take shots of their pregnant bellies should not inflict them on the public. Keep it for the father of the kids, or close friends and family.
    Security is not the absence of danger but the presence of God no matter what the danger.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. lisa marie presley?
    By elvislady in forum Off topic
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-08-2010, 07:04 AM
  2. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-04-2008, 06:46 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-28-2008, 07:28 AM
  4. Lisa Marie Presley Thank You!
    By presley31 in forum Elvis Presley
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-17-2008, 03:47 AM
  5. Lisa Marie Presley
    By Burning_Love in forum Elvis Presley
    Replies: 131
    Last Post: 08-31-2007, 09:33 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •