Here you see the two diffrent photo's. Now you can clearly see a slight diffrence of the angle the photo's are taken.
![]()
Here you see the two diffrent photo's. Now you can clearly see a slight diffrence of the angle the photo's are taken.
![]()
Danny Ocean, the only difference I see is the angle of the Coffin, not the photo of Elvis.
The photo is the same exact one on both angles. That's cause the cropped photo is just placed on a different photo of the coffin. If anything we would have then seen the face at a different angle.
Then some need to brush up on their reading.
And peppered throughout this thread and the prev. one regarding this topic were plenty of references to a wax figure. Also references made or inferred to doctored photo or has someone not read the thread all the way thru? LOL
No protesting just asking for facts of some people's "facts"...sort of like when they claimed something about aunt Lois.![]()
Elvis 25th Commemorative Special
The biggest-selling issue of all time for The National Enquirer was the issue with this photo on the cover. It sold a record-breaking 700,000 copies. The photo of Elvis, lyingn in his copper coffin in the music room of Graceland, was snapped by a Presley relative (Billy Mann), with an Instamatic camera supplied by the Enquirer. Security was tripled to keep out uninvited reporters and fans, but the relative was able to shot three quick frames and stuff the camera in his pocket. He immediately departed Graceland and was whisked away in a waiting limo, and the film rushed to a secret photo lab. A special photo team was flown in to Memphis from Florida to process the film. When the film was developed, the first two frames were unusable, but the third and final frame is the one you see on the cover of the Enquirer. The photo was considered so sensational that a senior editor and a security guard were detailed to accompany it at all times. The Enquirer has permitted this photo to be published only on a few occasions.
Sidenote: the pic is also next to the article...I can scan and post for thos interested, along w/the ORIGINAL Enquirer front pic (not an ebay copy) and the pic inside from a further angle.
So those who say it's a fake please post an article stating so that is a RELIABLE source.
I'm not sure how much more reliable you can get than the people that worked there and saw it all.
"I have learned never to ridicule any man's opinion, however strange it may seem."