http://www.ebay.com/itm/baby-elvis-p...item337f0cbfd8
nope don't think this is Elvis
Printable View
http://www.ebay.com/itm/baby-elvis-p...item337f0cbfd8
nope don't think this is Elvis
I also have doubt it was him. So cute baby anyway. :) :) :)
You right, Julie.Quote:
Originally Posted by hounddog
Elvis was born in a poor home in the thirties.
Identification bracelet is assumed only in hospitals!
This is not ELVIS!!!!
I'd like to see a photo about him when he was a baby. But it would have been already shown to the public I think.
who are they trying to kid............
There is a picture of Elvis as a baby but I don't remember where I saw it...sorry. The picture was a little grainy with age but seemed genuine. Maybe someone here at TBC has it and could post it?Quote:
Originally Posted by cibetty
Quote:
Originally Posted by elvia7
Exactly, Elvis was born at home and no identification bracelet was given there and it's pretty obvious this is not an old photo. Those little t-shirts weren't around then.
Oh, really? I would be glad if somebody would post it Diane.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diane
Now I have seen everything.....
Thatīs not Elvis! And thatīs already the second time people sell a picture of a baby and write itīs Elvis! :angry:
lol.....no you probably havnt, not yet. Still time for more c*ap to come out of the woodwork.....hahaQuote:
Originally Posted by King Of The Whole World
Sad but true.Quote:
Originally Posted by debtdbruno
If I know well, this was his first photo from 1937.
http://www.randomhouse.com/rhpg/prom...t/1937_big.jpg
Elvis and Gladys were both taken to Tupelo hospital after the birth at home. I've read it a few times now, I believe she was bleeding and very ill. But that baby in the photo I don't believe is Elvis.
http://www.elvis.com.au/presley/biog..._presley.shtml
This baby aint Elvis...