robman
03-21-2006, 11:02 AM
hey folks i'd like to talk about the sound of nashville recording from 60 to 64.
these 4 track recordings were very high in sound quality and had a very beautifull
ambience echo to them.
to this day songs like "something blue" "it hurts me" "ask me" ... sound very
modern.
during the same time elvis's movie recordings(which consisted of some great songs) had a very dry and generally poor sound.
these songs weren't recorded in nashville but in big movie studios.
the sound partitions were awfull, they had elvis in the middle and they
stuffed the entire band on either the left or right channel while the other
channel was virtually not used. it produced a very one sided sound.
even elvis's 70's recording (which were done in 16 tracks) weren't as good
as the early 60's songs from nashville studio b.
i wonder what his songs would have sounded like if they were done in the
same studio.
what's your opinion?
these 4 track recordings were very high in sound quality and had a very beautifull
ambience echo to them.
to this day songs like "something blue" "it hurts me" "ask me" ... sound very
modern.
during the same time elvis's movie recordings(which consisted of some great songs) had a very dry and generally poor sound.
these songs weren't recorded in nashville but in big movie studios.
the sound partitions were awfull, they had elvis in the middle and they
stuffed the entire band on either the left or right channel while the other
channel was virtually not used. it produced a very one sided sound.
even elvis's 70's recording (which were done in 16 tracks) weren't as good
as the early 60's songs from nashville studio b.
i wonder what his songs would have sounded like if they were done in the
same studio.
what's your opinion?