PDA

View Full Version : Do we REALLY need ANOTHER Elvis Mr. Potato Head???



Jungleroom76
01-31-2011, 01:51 PM
Just found this at Elvisinfonet.com:

EPE Embarrasses true Elvis fans Again: While EPE worry about Elvis' amazing legacy being tarnished by unauthorised products and "Graceland in Denmark", they then post ridiculous stories about the importance of ANOTHER Elvis Mr Potato Head!

As in "Elvis '68 Special Mr. Potato Head to be Unveiled at 2011 Toy Fair!"
And EPE states that this is "Big news!":

"Following the huge success of the “Mr. Potato Head Elvis Live” figure, PPW Toys will be showcasing “Mr. Potato Head Elvis ’68 Special” at the 2011 New York Toy Fair. We will release an image of the new Mr. Potato Head on Monday, February 14 right here on Elvis.com!"

GREAT now EPE spoil my Valentine's Day as well.
Elvis would surely turn in his grave.
(News, Source; EIN)

This is COMPLETELY unnecessary!!! But once again, it proves that EPE simply goes after the $$$$$ regardless of how it may affect Elvis' image!! Apparently the first Mr. Potato Head sold well enough for EPE to go back to the well for a second go-round... :doh:

...and EPE is worried about the image that is being presented in the FINAL CURTAIN box set???? This CLEARLY demonstrates just how out of whack EPE truly is!!! :angry:

TCB!
Mike

kathy parkinson
01-31-2011, 02:02 PM
Nothing surprises us any more Mike does it?

Enikő Lugosi
01-31-2011, 03:10 PM
A dream come true!

http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/6590/377b.jpg

Tommy
01-31-2011, 03:12 PM
Right on spot Mike. (y)

rickb
01-31-2011, 03:27 PM
Absolute crap and an embarrassment for Elvis fans

Enikő Lugosi
01-31-2011, 03:43 PM
How about the “Drink My Face!” Priscilla Presley motor oil?

http://www.fotofama.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/225px-motor_oil.jpg

Or Mrs. Potato head?

http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/2843/2143g.jpg

Jungleroom76
01-31-2011, 04:30 PM
How about the “Drink My Face!” Priscilla Presley motor oil?

http://www.fotofama.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/225px-motor_oil.jpg

Or Mrs. Potato head?

http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/2843/2143g.jpg

:lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao:

EXCELLENT MARKETING IDEAS coming to EPE's catalog soon!! :D

TCB!
Mike

Jungleroom76
01-31-2011, 04:30 PM
Nothing surprises us any more Mike does it?

Absolutely nothing Kathy...you're 100% right!! :doh:

TCB!
Mike

Awickedreigndrop
01-31-2011, 04:36 PM
This makes you wonder if they ever listen to the fans at all. I'm sure a lot of the fans didn't like the Elvis Mr Potato Head. I'd rather have an Elvis My Little Pony, at least it's nice and doesn't seem like a mockery.
http://hurricanevanessa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/My_Little_Elvis_Presley_by_Spippo.jpg
(This is just a modded My Little Pony)

Jungleroom76
01-31-2011, 04:42 PM
This makes you wonder if they ever listen to the fans at all. I'm sure a lot of the fans didn't like the Elvis Mr Potato Head. I'd rather have an Elvis My Little Pony, at least it's nice and doesn't seem like a mockery.
http://hurricanevanessa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/My_Little_Elvis_Presley_by_Spippo.jpg
(This is just a modded My Little Pony)

Certainly an interesting and unique idea!! (y)

TCB!
Mike

Awickedreigndrop
01-31-2011, 05:54 PM
I think so too Mike! You think they'd be able to come up with more tasteful toys if they wanted to lure in younger fans. Maybe they should stick with the Elvis Barbies, but even those went down in quality. I want to ask them, which is more important to them? Elvis' legacy or $$$.

Raymond Pruitt
01-31-2011, 06:05 PM
We never needed the first one.

Jungleroom76
01-31-2011, 06:29 PM
I think so too Mike! You think they'd be able to come up with more tasteful toys if they wanted to lure in younger fans. Maybe they should stick with the Elvis Barbies, but even those went down in quality. I want to ask them, which is more important to them? Elvis' legacy or $$$.

I think EPE has already answered that question with a resounding $$$$$$$$$$!!! :angry:

TCB!
Mike

Jungleroom76
01-31-2011, 06:31 PM
We never needed the first one.

EXACTLY RIGHT!!! :angry:

We can file the Elvis Mr. Potato Head away with the Elvis rubber ducks they were (still are?) selling!!! EPE is so concerned about Elvis' legacy with the release of the FINAL CURTAIN set, yet they can authorize this junk to be put out on store shelves to make a mockery of Elvis' image??? (n)

TCB!
Mike

Vegas69
01-31-2011, 06:49 PM
Jungleroom and Eniko good posts I agree disgracein Elvis memory at all times. Tells me again why Priss is so great?

monk37
01-31-2011, 07:23 PM
and EPE has the nerve to wonder why bootleg labels are supported by fans....

Vegas69
01-31-2011, 08:43 PM
and EPE has the nerve to wonder why bootleg labels are supported by fans....

Right. Amazin aint it?

Raised on Rock
01-31-2011, 10:24 PM
(News, Source; EIN)

This is COMPLETELY unnecessary!!! But once again, it proves that EPE simply goes after the $$$$$ regardless of how it may affect Elvis' image!! Apparently the first Mr. Potato Head sold well enough for EPE to go back to the well for a second go-round... :doh:

...and EPE is worried about the image that is being presented in the FINAL CURTAIN box set???? This CLEARLY demonstrates just how out of whack EPE truly is!!! :angry:

TCB!
Mike

Wait, wait, wait!!!! I just solve the mistery guys!

It was not Tupelo's Mississippi Elvis Presley King Of Rock and Roll the guy who faked his death and is still around! no no no...

It was Col. Tom Parker who faked his death, and the old guy is still around behind EPE managment. I mean, isn't this post just a solid piece of evidence?

Yes, it must be Col. Parker still running the bussiness, It must be, believe me.

elvia7
02-01-2011, 05:12 AM
I think EPE has already answered that question with a resounding $$$$$$$$$$!!! :angry:

TCB!
Mike


Yes! Mike I agree, for EPE, ELVIS don't exist gifferently only as $$$$$$$$$$$$:angry:

May
02-01-2011, 09:48 AM
Dear, dear, dear.
There's not much more to say.................
Its ALLLLL about the money!

elvis1608
02-01-2011, 09:56 AM
I agree we don't need mr patato head.
The only think how do we get more money.
or thinking about the guy from the final curtin,leave him alone we ELVIS fan need that people.

Peter

sasha
02-01-2011, 10:08 AM
IF it doesn't sell, they won't continue to make and sell it. Seems pretty simple to me.

Brian Quinn
02-01-2011, 10:22 AM
Both Priscilla and Lisa Marie are known to be members of the Church Of Scientology. I found the following on the Web which may have some relevance to the topic in question:

Business owners are urged to join the World Institute of Scientology Enterprises, where they pay a percentage of their earnings for no real benefit to their business. These funds flow back to the cult. WISE members are expected to implement management by statistics, overly aggressive sales techniques, and other of L. Ron Hubbard's business theories that can cause their business to suffer. WISE companies are expected to hire expensive Scientology management consultants and other experts.

I believe the amount payable to the Church is around 10%, which if looking at it in terms of the EPE gross yearly profit comes to abot $6 million.

Brian :hmm:

Albert
02-01-2011, 10:51 AM
I understand EPE has to cater various markets, but they tend to focus more on the cheesy easy-buck market (with mostly non-fans) than to the true fans (that made the Presleys millionaires and earned RCA billions).

There's no vision of long term strategy. They just seem to focus on one sale at the time. I wouldn't mind if mister Potato was a way to introduce Elvis to kids, combining it with a nice CD with child-friendly Elvis songs.

Tommy
02-01-2011, 10:54 AM
I wouldn't mind if mister Potato was a way to introduce Elvis to kids, combining it with a nice CD with child-friendly Elvis songs.

Very interesting Albert. :D

Jungleroom76
02-01-2011, 11:23 AM
Wait, wait, wait!!!! I just solve the mistery guys!

It was not Tupelo's Mississippi Elvis Presley King Of Rock and Roll the guy who faked his death and is still around! no no no...

It was Col. Tom Parker who faked his death, and the old guy is still around behind EPE managment. I mean, isn't this post just a solid piece of evidence?

Yes, it must be Col. Parker still running the bussiness, It must be, believe me.

I BELIEVE YOU, I BELIEVE YOU!!! ;)

I've said that before, that if you didn't know any better, you'd think the ol' Colonel was still alive and well and working for EPE!!! At the very least, the old man is probably sitting up there looking down at all of this cheesy merchandise and laughing!!! :angry:

TCB!
Mike

Jungleroom76
02-01-2011, 11:26 AM
Both Priscilla and Lisa Marie are known to be members of the Church Of Scientology. I found the following on the Web which may have some relevance to the topic in question:

Business owners are urged to join the World Institute of Scientology Enterprises, where they pay a percentage of their earnings for no real benefit to their business. These funds flow back to the cult. WISE members are expected to implement management by statistics, overly aggressive sales techniques, and other of L. Ron Hubbard's business theories that can cause their business to suffer. WISE companies are expected to hire expensive Scientology management consultants and other experts.

I believe the amount payable to the Church is around 10%, which if looking at it in terms of the EPE gross yearly profit comes to abot $6 million.

Brian :hmm:

Well THAT would certainly explain A LOT Brian!!! :hmm:

So not only is Priscilla possibly funneling money into her church, but she's doing so at the expense of Elvis' legacy!!! Certainly does put Priscilla in a WHOLE different light, if this turned out to be true... :angry:

I wonder what Elvis would think of all this, especially the whole Scientology thing...especially if he knew that his legacy was helping to fund this bunch of crackpots??? :hmm:

TCB!
Mike

Jungleroom76
02-01-2011, 11:27 AM
I understand EPE has to cater various markets, but they tend to focus more on the cheesy easy-buck market (with mostly non-fans) than to the true fans (that made the Presleys millionaires and earned RCA billions).

There's no vision of long term strategy. They just seem to focus on one sale at the time. I wouldn't mind if mister Potato was a way to introduce Elvis to kids, combining it with a nice CD with child-friendly Elvis songs.

Certainly a MUCH better marketing idea than what they currently are doing!! ;)

TCB!
Mike

Raised on Rock
02-01-2011, 11:45 AM
Well THAT would certainly explain A LOT Brian!!! :hmm:

So not only is Priscilla possibly funneling money into her church, but she's doing so at the expense of Elvis' legacy!!! Certainly does put Priscilla in a WHOLE different light, if this turned out to be true... :angry:

I wonder what Elvis would think of all this, especially the whole Scientology thing...especially if he knew that his legacy was helping to fund this bunch of crackpots??? :hmm:

TCB!
Mike

It is really disturbing to realize that Elvis legacy might be suffering and will continue suffering, because people behind it is digging into this mine of gold to give it away to one of the most ridicioulous brainwashing and damaging cults in resent history.

I believe once, I think is was Jerry Schilling, who told once that those scientology people aproached Elvis one time, and inmediately Elvis put them away realizing inmediately they where just after his bank account.

I don't think Elvis will approve at all this scientology thing going on with his daughter and Cilla if he was still around. And Elvis, we know, could be pretty harsh when he didn't aproved something.

debtdbruno
02-01-2011, 12:01 PM
this is true, try not buying the stuff..................

Diane
02-01-2011, 12:21 PM
How about the “Drink My Face!” Priscilla Presley motor oil?

http://www.fotofama.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/225px-motor_oil.jpg

Or Mrs. Potato head?

http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/2843/2143g.jpg

I'm wondering is products such as these were put on the market whether it would give Priscilla a reality check and make her realize how demeaning these items of Elvis are to him.

Jungleroom76
02-01-2011, 01:25 PM
I'm wondering is products such as these were put on the market whether it would give Priscilla a reality check and make her realize how demeaning these items of Elvis are to him.

Let's give it a try and see... :clap: ;)

TCB!
Mike

J.P
02-01-2011, 02:05 PM
I've said that before, that if you didn't know any better, you'd think the ol' Colonel was still alive and well and working for EPE!!! At the very least, the old man is probably sitting up there looking down at all of this cheesy merchandise and laughing!!! :angry:

TCB!
Mike

a good one Mike (y) :lol: i wonder what they call it when it's like a nightmare ... just that you never wake up :hmm: this is one of those things!!!!

monk37
02-01-2011, 07:39 PM
parker faked his death - that.explains.everything

maybe he's like one of those heads in a jar like on Futurama

sasha
02-01-2011, 10:08 PM
I guess no one remembers , Lisa hasn't owned any of that part since 2004.Priscilla never did. Complain to EPE, I do.I don't buy anything I don't want or will use.
I expect the little kids would like it though. Our little ones like SpongeBob.

As far as anyones religion; that's not anyones business.
But most churches like to have 10% .
http://www.bizjournals.com/memphis/stories/2004/12/13/daily26.html

Vegas69
02-02-2011, 01:50 AM
They been donatin to Scientology causes for EPE for many a year. I have friends who in that church and they say to me that yes epe member of wise and that few years ago Pris donatin a check for $5000 to some Scientolgoy charity in epe name. Lisa doin same.
So guess am sayin that Brian not off on what he sayin at all.

Vegas69
02-02-2011, 01:51 AM
I'm wondering is products such as these were put on the market whether it would give Priscilla a reality check and make her realize how demeaning these items of Elvis are to him.
Such good questionin ya know I dont think she be allowin that to happens. She much prefer to demean Elvis while she make herself to be the savior.

May
02-02-2011, 07:16 AM
.

I believe once, I think is was Jerry Schilling, who told once that those scientology people aproached Elvis one time, and inmediately Elvis put them away realizing inmediately they where just after his bank account.

I don't think Elvis will approve at all this scientology thing going on with his daughter and Cilla if he was still around. And Elvis, we know, could be pretty harsh when he didn't aproved something.

Very true. Yes it was Jerry who said it. I also read that Elvis looked into every religion going and although not agreeing with all of them, respected them all - apart from Scientology!!

Jungleroom76
02-02-2011, 10:58 AM
Very true. Yes it was Jerry who said it. I also read that Elvis looked into every religion going and although not agreeing with all of them, respected them all - apart from Scientology!!

Well that certainly says a lot, doesn't it May?? Elvis was such an open minded person and could see the good in every religion EXCEPT scientology?? Yet some of the money coming from the man's own namesake company is being funneled into this "religion" (I use the term LOOSELY) -- a "religion" which the man himself denounced!!! :angry:

Such a sad state of affairs for Elvis' memory and legacy... :sad:

TCB!
Mike

monk37
02-02-2011, 11:20 AM
Elvis saw scientology for the money grabbing scam it is - and Priscilla looked no further than their anti-drug policies

sasha
02-02-2011, 12:01 PM
Elvis saw scientology for the money grabbing scam it is - and Priscilla looked no further than their anti-drug policies

To be honest; I see a lot of "churches" and "religious people" this way.

Vegas69
02-02-2011, 05:35 PM
Wonder if she took Priscilla their courses when she was doing coke with Edwards? And didn seem to help her son with drugs either. Cant be blamin Elvis for either he was long gone when she startin doin that.

Diane
02-03-2011, 08:46 AM
To be honest; I see a lot of "churches" and "religious people" this way.

True some do but I don't think to the extent that the scientology group does. And to be called a church or religion, shouldn't God or Jesus be mentioned.... or at least some diety?

May
02-03-2011, 09:14 AM
Isnt it all about aliens or something though, Diane?:doh::lol:;)

Obviously only RICH aliens though!!:lol:

LaurieT
02-03-2011, 09:59 AM
Ha-LOL good one May!!

sasha
02-03-2011, 10:24 AM
True some do but I don't think to the extent that the scientology group does. And to be called a church or religion, shouldn't God or Jesus be mentioned.... or at least some diety?

I've read a little about Scientology. It just never interested me much. Of course, an atheist will
tell us we've just made up the myth of God and Jesus. To each their own, I guess.

Raised on Rock
02-03-2011, 10:57 AM
Well that certainly says a lot, doesn't it May?? Elvis was such an open minded person and could see the good in every religion EXCEPT scientology?? Yet some of the money coming from the man's own namesake company is being funneled into this "religion" (I use the term LOOSELY) -- a "religion" which the man himself denounced!!! :angry:

Such a sad state of affairs for Elvis' memory and legacy... :sad:

TCB!
Mike

As you say, Elvis was a very open minded guy, and a very religious one. He was a christian, but as we know he was always willing to read and learn about other religions (particualry: Judaism, because of his mother family and Buddhism because of his Karate studies) and was very keen about readings in the line of Kahlili Gibran and that stuff, I think founded that exange most positive.

Yet, when it came about scientolgy, according to Jerry, he put them aside not just because they were obviously only after his money, but because he founded (I believe he attended one meeting) the whole thing a load of crap.

So, and now your money is going to them at the cost of your own legacy? something is not so cool there.

***

Sure, they might have helped Lisa with his drug problem and all, but those guys will always make you think they were the one and only answer for you and that now you own them, and they will collect. Is not about suggesting a free will donation as many healthy religion might do, this is about, you own us you pay or else...

Now, sure, everybody is entitled to believe whatever they want, and I do respect that. Sure an atheist might tell us that Jesus, Budha, or whatever is as unreal as aliens. Well is not that simple, there is a lot of principles involved and so NO is not the same, even if there is no God and so, there is a big difference between religions and scientology in terms of ethics. That argument: is the same if you say aliens or god, is part of what they use to make you think they are ok, they are not ok. Although that might be just my opinion.

But the main point is not what they believe in, as I said they got the right too, the point is the money. Sure, all religious institutions, all churchs and all need money, but there is a diffrence between donation and the bill is... between free will and straigh brain washing, between we live in an world run by $$$ but our intention first is to benefit humanity, and this is a straigh business that runs under the premise of making you believe you need us and here is the bottom line: you don't have any money, oh you're not even welcome here. Now that put things in perspective right?

Diane
02-03-2011, 11:31 AM
But the main point is not what they believe in, as I said they got the right too, the point is the money. Sure, all religious institutions, all churchs and all need money, but there is a diffrence between donation and the bill is... between free will and straigh brain washing, between we live in an world run by $$$ but our intention first is to benefit humanity, and this is a straigh business that runs under the premise of making you believe you need us and here is the bottom line: you don't have any money, oh you're not even welcome here. Now that put things in perspective right?[/QUOTE]

(y)(y)(y)

Diane
02-03-2011, 11:32 AM
Isnt it all about aliens or something though, Diane?:doh::lol:;)

Obviously only RICH aliens though!!:lol:

Yes but I'm not sure anymore what the founder believed. He was considered a nut case though.

sasha
02-03-2011, 11:48 AM
Unfortunately, it seems to be what parts of our world is anymore. Just check out the TV ministries.
If you don't have $$$, you're not welcomed ,except to increase their "crowd level. "
I'm certainly not going to argue for Scientology, as I never saw anything to it.
But, sorry. Many of our "christian" churches are doing the same.
As to the money-- it doesn't come from Elvis or his fans. Sillerman is no Scientologist.
If Cilla and Lisa choose to donate -- it's money they've made, not from Elvis. EPE owns that part now.
For what it's worth-- it seems it helped Lisa get off "drugs" {her words, not mine} and {hopefully} make her life better
I can't fault them for improving someone's life, even if I don't agree with their philosophy.

Diane
02-03-2011, 01:49 PM
Unfortunately, it seems to be what parts of our world is anymore. Just check out the TV ministries.
If you don't have $$$, you're not welcomed ,except to increase their "crowd level. "
I'm certainly not going to argue for Scientology, as I never saw anything to it.
But, sorry. Many of our "christian" churches are doing the same.
As to the money-- it doesn't come from Elvis or his fans. Sillerman is no Scientologist.
If Cilla and Lisa choose to donate -- it's money they've made, not from Elvis. EPE owns that part now.
For what it's worth-- it seems it helped Lisa get off "drugs" {her words, not mine} and {hopefully} make her life better
I can't fault them for improving someone's life, even if I don't agree with their philosophy.

I don't fault Lisa and Priscilla. It's their choice but I do find anyone who gives that much money to a so-called religious organization pretty naive and foolish....and that's just my personal opinion. Just out of curiosity I will have to go look up info on scientology again.

sasha
02-03-2011, 02:28 PM
I don't fault Lisa and Priscilla. It's their choice but I do find anyone who gives that much money to a so-called religious organization pretty naive and foolish....and that's just my personal opinion. Just out of curiosity I will have to go look up info on scientology again.

I haven't looked at Scientology for years. It was Dianetics that I read . Just skimmed over some articles
on Scientology. Here's a video explaining a lot of it. Different from what I've always heard .Who knows?
Maybe I could be a Scientologist and just don't know it......haha. ;}
http://www.scientology.org/what-is-scientology/the-practice-of-scientology.html

Whatever-- we need to get after EPE/Sillerman about the "potato heads" and other things we don't like. He's the one that controls all that now.

Jungleroom76
02-03-2011, 03:23 PM
Whatever-- we need to get after EPE/Sillerman about the "potato heads" and other things we don't like. He's the one that controls all that now.

Yeah, but the way his company is tanking in the stock market, who knows how much longer he'll be in control!! Let's just hope if he decides to sell his share of EPE, that he doesn't sell it to someone EVEN MORE inept at handling Elvis' legacy than he is/was!!! :doh: :angry:

TCB!
Mike

Diane
02-03-2011, 03:33 PM
I haven't looked at Scientology for years. It was Dianetics that I read . Just skimmed over some articles
on Scientology. Here's a video explaining a lot of it. Different from what I've always heard .Who knows?
Maybe I could be a Scientologist and just don't know it......haha. ;}
http://www.scientology.org/what-is-scientology/the-practice-of-scientology.html

Whatever-- we need to get after EPE/Sillerman about the "potato heads" and other things we don't like. He's the one that controls all that now.

Thank you Sasha. That was an interesting video but everything that was said people already know...they just need to practice it.

sasha
02-03-2011, 09:52 PM
Yeah, but the way his company is tanking in the stock market, who knows how much longer he'll be in control!! Let's just hope if he decides to sell his share of EPE, that he doesn't sell it to someone EVEN MORE inept at handling Elvis' legacy than he is/was!!! :doh: :angry:

TCB!
Mike Just hang on there, Mike. It's slowly coming back up.....I'm an optimist and just fuss at the ones that can change things...:}

Daily closing stock quote for CKx, Inc. (NASDAQ:CKXE)

2/3/2011 4:00:00 PM
Last Price Change Open Day High 52-Week High
3.44 0.03 (0.88%) 3.42 3.50 7.06
Volume Previous Close Day Low 52-Week Low
371,800 3.41

sasha
02-03-2011, 09:58 PM
Thank you Sasha. That was an interesting video but everything that was said people already know...they just need to practice it.

It was interesting to me too, Diane. Nothing like I remember reading about. Maybe I read the wrong stuff before??
Might have to look at that a little closer . Yes, it's what the whole world needs to be doing, wonder why we don't? Words don't mean much without actions.

monk37
02-03-2011, 10:51 PM
Oh, I mis-read your response and assumed that you were an atheist, like me.

sasha
02-03-2011, 11:19 PM
Oh, I mis-read your response and assumed that you were an atheist, like me.

I'm no atheist, just disappointed with the way some so-called "religious" people act.
I have some friends that are very disillusioned as well. Hope the world improves. It will take all of us.
Atheist's included , enough room for everyone.......:} don't want to miss out on a technicality

May
02-04-2011, 01:24 AM
As to the money-- it doesn't come from Elvis or his fans. Sillerman is no Scientologist.
If Cilla and Lisa choose to donate -- it's money they've made, not from Elvis. EPE owns that part now.
For what it's worth-- it seems it helped Lisa get off "drugs" {her words, not mine} and {hopefully} make her life better
I can't fault them for improving someone's life, even if I don't agree with their philosophy.

Depends which way you look at it (the money that has been earnt). It has been earnt through Elvis's talent, and us fans buying his music etc. Priscilla is like the middle man as it were.

I dont know enough about scientology - as I tend to really only find out things of which I am interested - but anything that gets anyone off drugs is always a good thing.

sasha
02-04-2011, 02:43 AM
This is the agreement between Lisa and Sillerman .Also, Cilla's role in anything connected.
http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/CKX_(CKXE)/Contribution_Exchange_Agreement

You can find just about anything on the Net ,it seems. But, the history is more interesting I think.
Though Elvis' music is very good, it took some courage and lots of faith for the Executors to open
Graceland so many years ago. I'm glad it worked for all of them and us.I'm not sure I could have did it.

Vegas69
02-04-2011, 05:05 AM
I dunno understand, how is Priss paid 6 million for a name she does not have? Elvis in divorce decree stated he no want her to profit business wise form his name so how is she paid for something is not her's?

Diane
02-04-2011, 07:55 AM
I dunno understand, how is Priss paid 6 million for a name she does not have? Elvis in divorce decree stated he no want her to profit business wise form his name so how is she paid for something is not her's?

That's something I will never understand. How did she get past this?

debtdbruno
02-04-2011, 10:09 AM
I dislike the fact she couldn't wait to 'get rid' of his name when she left...................but legally she has every right to use 'Presley' till the day she re-marries.

sasha
02-04-2011, 10:41 AM
This is the agreement between Lisa and Sillerman .Also, Cilla's role in anything connected.
http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/CKX_(CKXE)/Contribution_Exchange_Agreement


Please read this agreement . No one paid Cilla for "her name."She was used as a "consultent." I expect she might know a bit about running EPE since she did for many years. The Rights to Elvis' name was fought for years ago by EPE and it's Executors. It only benefited and protected Lisa's interest . " At closing, Priscilla Presley entered into a consulting agreement with EPE Inc. for a period of ten years under which she will be paid $560,000 per year." Which is 4 more years, and 560 thousand dollars a year, not millions.

The story of Priscilla not being able to use the Presley name is false. It's not in the will anywhere. In fact, her name's not mentioned in the whole thing. http://www.ibiblio.org/elvis/elvwill.html

sasha
02-04-2011, 10:45 AM
I dislike the fact she couldn't wait to 'get rid' of his name when she left...................but legally she has every right to use 'Presley' till the day she re-marries.

I agree. Many times I've thought about going back to my "maiden name" after my divorce. But, my child has his name. So, for her sake and to not confuse teachers, etc. I've kept it.

kathy parkinson
02-04-2011, 12:23 PM
I agree Sasha, i too have kept my surname for my children, i divorced their father not them. I also agree with you on your last statement, sadly the Priscilla haters,and there are some, won't agree with any of it, even when it's a legal piece of paper.

sasha
02-04-2011, 12:40 PM
I agree Sasha, i too have kept my surname for my children, i divorced their father not them. I also agree with you on your last statement, sadly the Priscilla haters,and there are some, won't agree with any of it, even when it's a legal piece of paper.
I don't hate any of the ones that knew Elvis. True, I like some more than others.But, the ones I just can't like, I stay away from....;}
I found most of the things on Cilla when I got over "not liking her" and decided to see what she had to do with him.I was no fan of hers--{still not} until I decided to get some facts instead of complaining. My dislike of her had to do with Lisa. Where I've found more on that too. I probably would have whipped Lisa's behind; among other things.....:}

kathy parkinson
02-04-2011, 04:08 PM
Sasha, your like a breath of fresh air.

Vegas69
02-04-2011, 08:10 PM
Read again Sasha sayin she paid $6 million in part for the USE of the Presley name. And her pay has been increased reports last week her consult salary is almost $900 thousand a year a little short of that. And yes a site long agos had a copy of the entire divorce and sayin in there per Elvis request she was not usin his name for business ventures that is not false. Many Elvis guys confirms it to.
I dont understandin the Priss lovers this woman done nothin really nothin. Elvis is why fans are there and his talent whys we stay. Graceland bein open was no brain thinkin and would have been open with or without Priss. Monkees could sell Elvis. Oh wait already do.

sasha
02-05-2011, 01:01 AM
Lisa is still called Ms Presley and she took over EPE at the age of 25.
Her mother consulted; just like the other two Executors. The National Bank of Commerce in Memphis, and Joseph Hanks.All 3 were paid a salary. No one was paid any millions, except when Lisa sold EPE in Dec,2004 and that went to pay off debts and to Lisa. Lisa never appeared to want much to with any of the business part; leaving it to the 3 Executors to run EPE. I think she had mixed feelings about Graceland and it made her angry and sad the way her dads "friends and family" talked about him. That's my opinion and everyone can make up their own minds. I don't really care whether anyone likes Lisa or Cilla.I've made my peace with all that .They can speak for themselves, Elvis can't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Marie_Presley


After Elvis' death on August 16, 1977 at Graceland, his will appointed his father, Vernon Presley, executor and trustee.[5] The beneficiaries of the trust were Vernon, Elvis' grandmother Minnie Mae Presley, and his nine year old daughter Lisa Marie Presley, whose inheritance was to be held in trust until her twenty-fifth birthday.[5] After Vernon's death in 1979, Elvis' ex-wife Priscilla Presley was named as one of three trustees in his will; the others being the National Bank of Commerce in Memphis, and Joseph Hanks, who had been Elvis and Vernon's accountant.[5] With Minnie Mae's passing in 1980, Lisa Marie became the only surviving beneficiary named in Elvis's will.[5]
In 1998, Lisa became more closely involved with the management team of The Elvis Presley Trust and its business entity, Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc.(EPE). She was owner and Chairman of the Board until February 2005, when she sold 85 percent of the estate's business holdings to CKX, Inc., excluding Graceland itself and the property within it.[5]



TheContribution and Exchange Agreement



ThePresley Acquisition was effected pursuant to a Contribution and ExchangeAgreement dated December 15, 2004 by and among the Company, The PromenadeTrust, a Tennessee grantor trust (the “Trust”) and RFX Acquisition. The Trusthas historically directly owned and operated the assets and businesses of ElvisPresley which existed at the time of his death and has owned and operated the businesses and assets acquired and/or created after Elvis’ death through itsownership of 100% of Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. (“EPE Inc.”). Prior to consummation of the Presley Acquisition, the Trust contributed the Presley assets and businesses not owned by EPE Inc. to a newly formed Tennessee limitedliability company, Elvis Presley Enterprises, LLC (“EPE LLC”).



At the closing of the Presley Acquisition, the Trust contributed 85% of theoutstanding equity interests of EPE Inc. and 85% of the membership interests ofEPE LLC to the Company. In exchange, the Trust received from the Company$50,125,000 in cash, 1,491,817 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock,no par value per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) and one share of SeriesC Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value per share (the “Series C PreferredStock”) valued at $22,825,000, and 500,000 shares of Common Stock valued at$7.67 per share (which represents the three day average of the Company’sclosing stock price following public announcement of the transaction). Inaddition, at closing, the Company repaid $25,125,000 of outstandingindebtedness of the Presley Business. The Trust continues to own 15% of theoutstanding equity interests of EPE Inc. and 15% of the membership interests ofEPE LLC.



Lisa Marie Presley, who is the sole beneficiary of the Trust, will remain involved in the Presley Business through the Trust’s continued ownership interest in each of EPE Inc. and EPE LLC, the Trust’s right as the holder of the Series CPreferred Stock to elect a director (as described below), and Ms. Presley’s long-term employment agreement with EPE Inc.

At the closing, the Company entered into long-term employment agreements with Jack Soden and Gary Hovey,key members of EPE Inc. management, pursuant to which Messrs. Soden and Hoveywill continue to oversee the day-to-day operations of the Presley Business.

At closing, Priscilla Presley entered into a consulting agreement with EPE Inc. for a period of ten years under which she will be paid $560,000 per year.

It is anticipated that on February 8, 2005, Ms. Presley will be elected by the holder of the Series C At closing, Priscilla Presley entered into a consulting agreement with EPE Preferred Stock to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors.

Vegas69
02-05-2011, 01:47 AM
Sasha no wanna argue with you but what you are write is old, look up google or I find Priss salary increase few mos. ago. And she paid 6 million for Presley name, google it.
And Lisa inherited estate at 30, only part at 25 well documented that.

What you type up there make no mentions of the 6 million which she was paid for and Lisa had to LEGALLY ASKIN the courts to change her name back to maiden Priss did nothing like that. So askin again how she got arounds the divorce decree which DID happens.

sasha
02-05-2011, 09:23 AM
Last Will and Testament of Elvis A. Presley
Last Will And Testament Of Elvis A. Presley, Deceased
Filed August 22, 1977

Last Will And Testament of Elvis Presley

I, Elvis A. Presley, a resident and citizen of Shelby County,
Tennessee, being of sound mind and disposing memory, do hereby
make, publish and declare this instrument to be my last will and
testament, hereby revoking any and all wills and codicils by me
at any time heretofore made.

Item I
Debts, Expenses and Taxes

I direct my Executor, hereinafter named, to pay all of my
matured debts and my funeral expenses, as well as the costs and
expenses of the administration of my estate, as soon after my
death as practicable. I further direct that all estate,
inheritance, transfer and succession taxes which are payable by
reason under this will, be paid out of my residuary estate; and
I hereby waive on behalf of my estate any right to recover from
any person any part of such taxes so paid. My Executor, in his
sole discretion, may pay from my domiciliary estate all or any
portion of the costs of ancillary administration and similar
proceedings in other jurisdictions.

Item II

Instruction Concerning Personal Property: Enjoyment in Specie

I anticipate that included as a part of my property and estate
at the time of my death will be tangible personal property of
various kinds, characters and values, including trophies and
other items accumulated by me during my professional career. I
hereby specifically instruct all concerned that my Executor,
herein appointed, shall have complete freedom and discretion as
to disposal of any and all such property so long as he shall act
in good faith and in the best interest of my estate and my
beneficiaries, and his discretion so exercised shall not be
subject to question by anyone whomsoever.

I hereby expressly authorize my Executor and my Trustee,
respectively and successively, to permit any beneficiary of any
and all trusts created hereunder to enjoy in specie the use or
benefit of any household goods, chattels, or other tangible
personal property (exclusive of choses in action, cash,
stocks, bonds or other securities) which either my Executor or my
Trustees may receive in kind, and my Executor and my Trustees
shall not be liable for any consumption, damage, injury to or
loss of any tangible property so used, nor shall the
beneficiaries of any trusts hereunder or their executors of
administrators be liable for any consumption, damage, injury to
or loss of any tangible personal property so used.

Item III

Real Estate

If I am the owner of any real estate at the time of my death, I
instruct and empower my Executor and my Trustee (as the case may
be) to hold such real estate for investment, or to sell same, or
any portion therof, as my Executor or my Trustee (as the case
may be) shall in his sole judgment determine to be for the best
interest of my estate and the beneficiaries thereof.

Item IV

Residuary Trust

After payment of all debts, expenses and taxes as directed under
Item I hereof, I give, devise, and bequeath all the rest,
residue, and remainder of my estate, including all lapsed
legacies and devices, and any property over which I have a power
of appointment, to my Trustee, hereinafter named, in trust for
the following purposes:

(a) The Trustees is directed to take, hold, manage, invest and
reinvent the corpus of the trust and to collect the income
therefrom in accordance with the rights, powers, duties,
authority and discretion hereinafter set forth. The Trustee is
directed to pay all the expenses, taxes and costs incurred in
the management of the trust estate out of the income thereof.

(b) After payment of all expenses, taxes and costs incurred in
the management of the expenses, taxes and costs incurred in the
management of the trust estate, the Trustee is authorizes to
accumulate the net income or to pay or apply so much of the net
income and such portion of the principal at any time and from
time to time to time for health, education, support, comfortable
maintenance and welfare of: (1) My daughter, Lisa
Marie Presley, and any other lawful issue I might have, (2) my
grandmother, Minnie Mae Presley, (3) my father, Vernon E.
Presley, and (4) such other relatives of mine living at the time
of my death who in the absolute discretion of my Trustees are in
need of emergency assistance for any of the above mentioned
purposes and the Trustee is able to make such distribution
without affecting the ability of the trust to meet the present
needs of the first three numbered categories of beneficiaries
herein mentioned or to meet the reasonably expected future needs
of the first three classes of beneficiaries herein mentioned.
Any decision of the Trustee as to whether or not distribution,
to any of the persons described hereunder shall be final and
conclusive and not subject to question by any legatee or
beneficiary hereunder.

(c) Upon the death of my Father, Vernon E. Presley, the Trustee
is instructed to make no further distributions to the fourth
category of beneficiaries and such beneficiaries shall cease to
have any interest whatsoever in this trust.

(d) Upon the death of both my said father and my said
grandmother, the Trustee is directed to divide the Residuary
Trust into separate and equal trusts, creating one such equal
trust for each of my lawful children then surviving and one such
equal trust for the living issue collectively, if any, of any
deceased child of mine. The share, if any, for the issue of any
such deceased child, shall immediately vest in such issue in
equal shares but shall be subject to the provisions of Item V
herein. Separate books and records shall be kept for each
trust, but it shall not be necessary that a physical division of
the assets be made as to each trust.

The Trustee may from time to time distribute the whole or any
part of the net income or principal from each of the aforesaid
trusts as the Trustee, in its uncontrolled discretion, considers
necessary or desirable to provide for the comfortable support,
education, maintenance, benefit and general welfare of each of
my children. Such distributions may be made directly to such
beneficiary or to the guardian of the person of such beneficiary
and without repsonsibilty on my Trustee to see to the
application of nay such distributions and in making such
distributions, the Trustee shall take into account all other
sources of funds known by the Trustee to be available for each
respective beneficiary for such purpose.

(e) As each of my respective children attains the age of
twenty-five (25) years and provided that both my father and my
grandmother are deceased, the trust created hereunder for such
child care terminate, and all the remainder of the assets then
contained in said trust shall be distributed to such child so
attaining the age of twenty-five (25) years outright and free of
further trust.

(f) If any of my children for whose benefit a trust has been
created hereunder should die before attaining the age of twenty-
five (25) years, then the trust created for such a child shall
terminate on his death, and all remaining assets then contained
in said trust shall be distributed outright and free of further
trust and in equal shares to the surviving issue of such
deceased child but subject to the provisions of Item V herein;
but if there be no such surviving issue , then to the brothers
and sisters of such deceased child in equal shares, the issue of
any other deceased child being entitled collectively to their
deceased parent's share. Nevertheless, if any distribution
otherwise becomes payable outright and free of trust under the
provisions of this paragraph (f) of the Item IV of my will to a
beneficiary for whom the Trustee is then administering a trust
for the benefit of such beneficiary under provisions of this
last will and testament, such distribution shall not be paid
outright to such beneficiary but shall be added to and become a
part of the trust so being administered for such beneficiary by
the Trustee.

Item V

Distribution to Minor Children

If any share of corpus of any trust established under this will
become distributable outright and free of trust to any
beneficiary before said beneficiary has attained the age of
eighteen (18) years, then said share shall immediately vest in
said beneficiary, but the Trustee shall retain possession of
such share during the period in which such beneficiary is under
the age of eighteen (18) years, and, in the meantime, shall use
and expend so much of the income and principal for the care,
support, and education of such beneficiary, and any income not
so expended with respect to each share so retained all the power
and discretion had with respect to such trust generally.

Item VI

Alternate Distributees

In the event that all of my descendants should be deceased at
any time prior to the time for the termination of the trusts
provided for herein, then in such event all of my estate and all
the assets of every trust to be created hereunder (as the case
may be) shall then distributed outright in equal shares to my
heirs at law per stripes.

Item VII

Unenforceable Provisions

If any provisions of this will are unenforceable, the remaining
provisions shall, nevertheless, be carried into effect.

Item VIII

Life Insurance

If my estate is the beneficiary of any life insurance on my
life at the time of my death, I direct that the proceeds
therefrom will be used by my Executor in payment of the debts ,
expenses and taxes listed in Item I of this will, to the extent
deemed advisable by the Executor. All such proceeds not so used
are to be used by my Executor for the purpose of satisfying the
devises and bequests contained in Item IV herein.

Item IX

Spendthrift Provision

I direct that the interest of any beneficiary in principal or
income of any trust created hereunder shall not be subject to
claims of creditors or others, nor to legal process, and may not
be voluntarily or involuntarily alienated or encumbered except as
herein provided. Any bequests contained herein for any female
shall be for her sole and separate use, free from the debts,
contracts and control of any husband she may ever have.

Item X

Proceeds From Personal Services

All sums paid after my death (either to my estate or to any of
the trusts created hereunder) and resulting from personal
services rendered by me during my lifetime, including, but not
limited to, royalties of all nature, concerts, motion picture
contracts, and personal appearances shall be considered to be
income, notwithstanding the provisions of estate and trust law
to the contrary.

Item XI

Executor and Trustee

I appoint as executor of this, my last will and testament, and
as Trustee of every trust required to be created hereunder, my
said father.

I hereby direct that my said father shall be entitled by his
last will ant testament, duly probated, to appoint a successor
Executor of my estate, as well as a successor Trustee or
successor Trustees of all the trusts to be created under my last
will and testament.

If, for any reason, my said father be unable to serve or to
continue to serve as Executor and/or as Trustee, or if he be
deceased and shall not have appointed a successor Executor or
Trustee, by virtue of his last will and testament as stated
-above, then I appoint National Bank of Commerce, Memphis,
Tennessee, or its successor or the institution with which it may
merge, as successor Executor and/or as successor Trustee of all
trusts required to be established hereunder.

None of the appointees named hereunder,including any appointment
made by virtue of the last will and testament of my said father,
shall be required to furnish any bond or security for
performance of the respective fiduciary duties required
hereunder, notwithstanding any rule of law to the contrary.

Item XII

Powers, Duties, Privileges and Immunities of the Trustee

Except as otherwise stated expressly to the contrary herein, I
give and grant to the said Trustee (and to the duly appointed
successor Trustee when acting as such) the power to do
everything he deems advisable with respect to the administration
of each trust required to be established under this, my last
will and Testament, even though such powers would not be
authorized or appropriate for the Trustee under statutory or
other rules of law. By way of illustration and not in
limitation of the generality of the foregoing grant of power and
authority of the Trustee, I give and grant to him plenary power
as follows:

(a) To exercise all those powers authorized to fiduciaries under
the provisions of the Tennessee Code Annotated, Sections 35-616
to 35-618, inclusive, including any amendments thereto in effect
at the time of my death, and the same are expressly referred to
and incorporated herein by reference.

(b) Plenary power is granted to the Trustee, not only to relieve
him from seeking judicial instruction, but to the extent that
the Trustee deems it to be prudent, to encourage determinations
freely to be made in favor of persons who are the current income
beneficiaries. In such instances the rights of all subsequent
beneficiaries are subordinate, and the Trustee shall not be
answerable to any subsequent beneficiary for anything done or
omitted in favor of a current income beneficiary may compel any
such favorable or preferential treatment. Without in anywise
minimizing or impairing the scope of this declaration of intent,
it includes investment policy, exercise of discretionary power
to pay or apply principal and income, and determination
principal and income questions;

(c) It shall be lawful for the Trustee to apply any sum that is
payable to or for the benefit of a minor (or any other person
who in the Judgment of the Trustee, is incapable of making
proper disposition thereof) by payments in discharge of the
costs and expenses of educating, maintaining and supporting said
beneficiary, or to make payment to anyone with whom said
beneficiary resides or who has the care or custody of the
beneficiary, temporarily or permanently, all without
intervention of any guardian or like fiduciary. The receipt of
anyone to whom payment is so authorized to be made shall be a
complete discharge of the Trustees without obligation on his
part to see to the further application hereto, and without
regard to other resource that the beneficiary may have, or the
duty of any other person to support the beneficiary;

(d) In Dealing with the Trustee, no grantee, pledge, vendee,
mortgage, lessee or other transference of the trust properties,
or any part therof, shall be bound to inquire with respect to
the purpose or necessity of any such disposition or to see to
the application of any consideration therefore paid to the
Trustee.

Item XIII

Concerning the Trustee and the Executor

(a) If at any time the Trustee shall have reasonable doubt as to
his power, authority or duty in the administration of any trust
herein created, it shall be lawful for the Trustee to obtain the
advice and counsel of reputable legal counsel without resorting
to the courts for instructions; and the Trustee shall be fully
absolved from all liability and damage or detriment to the
various trust estates of any beneficiary thereunder by reason of
anything done, suffered or omitted pursuant to advice of said
counsel given and obtained in good faith, provided that nothing
contained herein shall be construed to prohibit or prevent the
Trustee in all proper cases from applying to a court of
competent jurisdiction for instructions in the administration
of the trust assets in lieu of obtaining advice of counsel.

(b) In managing, investing, and controlling the various trust
estates, the Trustee shall exercise the judgment and care under
the circumstances then prevailing, which men of prudence
discretion and judgment exercise in the management of their own
affairs, not in regard to speculation, but in regard to the
permanent disposition of their funds, considering the probable
income as well as the probable safety of their capital, and, in
addition, the purchasing power of income distribution to
beneficiaries.

(c) My Trustee (as well as my Executor) shall be entitled to
reasonable and adequate and adequate compensation for the
fiduciary services rendered by him.

(d) My Executor and his successor Executor and his successor
Executor shall have the same rights, privileges, powers and
immunities herein granted to my Trustee wherever appropriate.

(e) In referring to any fiduciary hereunder, for purposes of
construction, masculine pronouns may include a corporate
fiduciary and neutral pronouns may include an individual
fiduciary.

Item XIV

Law Against Perpetuities

(a) Having in mind the rule against perpetuities, I direct that
(notwithstanding anything contained to the contrary in this last
will and testament) each trust created under this will (except
such trust created under this will (except such trusts as have
heretofore vested in compliance with such rule or law) shall
end, unless sooner terminated under other provisions of this
will, twenty-one (21) years after the death of the last survivor
of such of the beneficiaries hereunder as are living at the time
of my death; and thereupon that the property held in trust shall
be distributed free of all trust to the persons then entitled to
receive the income and/or principal therefrom, in the proportion
in proportion in which they are then entitled to receive such
income.

(b) Notwithstanding anything else contained in this will to the
contrary, I direct that if any distribution under this will
become payable to a person for whom the Trustee is then
administering a trust created hereunder for the benefit of such
person, such distribution shall be made to such trust and not to
the beneficiary outright, and the funds so passing to such trust
shall become a part thereof as corpus and be administered and
distributed to the same extent and purpose as if such funds had
been a part of such a trust at its inception.

Item XV

Payment of Estate and Inheritance Taxes

Notwithstanding the provisions of Item X herein, I authorize my
Executor to use such sums received by my estate after my death
and resulting from my personal services as identified in Item X
as he deem necessary and advisable in order to pay the taxes
referred to in Item I of my said will.

In WITNESS WHEREOF, I, the said ELVIS A. PRESLEY, do hereunto
set my hand and seal in the presence of two (2) competent
witnesses, and in their presence do publish and declare this
instrument to be my Last Will and Testament, this 3 day of
March, 1977.

[Signed by Elvis A. Presley]
ELVIS A. PRESLEY

The foregoing instrument, consisting of this and eleven (11)
preceding typewritten pages, was signed, sealed, published and
declared by ELVIS A.PRESLEY, the Testator, to be his Last Will
and Testament, in our presence, and we, at his request and in
his presence and in the presence of each other, have hereunto
subscribed our names as witnesses, this 3 day of March, 1977, at
Memphis, Tennessee.

[Signed by Ginger Alden]
Ginger Alden residing at 4152 Royal Crest Place

[Signed by Charles F. Hodge]
Charles F. Hodge residing at 3764 Elvis Presley Blvd.

[Signed by Ann Dewey Smith]
Ann Dewey Smith residing at 2237 Court Avenue.

State of Tennessee

County of Shelby

Ginger Alden, Charles F. Hodge, and Ann Dewey Smith, after being
first duly sworn, make oath or affirm that the foregoing Last
Will and Testament, in the sight and presence of us, the
undersigned, who at his request and in his sight and presence,
and in the sight and presence of each other, have subscribed our
names as attesting witnesses on the 3 day of March, 1977, and we
further make oath or affirm that the Testator was of sound mind
and disposing memory and not acting under fraud, menace or undue
influence of any person, and was more than eighteen (18) years
of age; and that each of the attesting witnesses is more than
eighteen (18) years of age.

[Signed by Ginger Alden]
Ginger Alden

[Signed by Charles F. Hodge]
Charles F. Hodge

[Signed by Ann Dewey Smith]
Ann Dewey Smith

Sworn To And Subscribed before me this 3 day of March, 1977.

Drayton Beecker Smith II Notary Public

My commission expires:

August 8, 1979

Admitted to probate and Ordered Recorded August 22, 1977

Joseph W. Evans, Judge

Recorded August 22, 1977
B.J. Dunavant, Clerk
By: Jan Scott, D.C.

sasha
02-05-2011, 09:50 AM
http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/92545558.html



Birth of an Enterprise

Despite multi-million-dollar movie deals, recording royalties of$250,000, and albums and concerts that brought in more than $100,000each, Elvis' estate was worth only $4.9 million at the time of hisdeath. (8) Elvis' manager, Tom Parker--who was subsequently boughtout by the trust--received half of Elvis' income, (9) and Elvis hadsold RCA the royalty rights to his recordings before 1973. (10) Themarkets for Elvis were very fragmented, and copyrights were not enforcedon music or the myriad of Elvis products and souvenirs being sold.Elvis' will appointed his father, Vernon Presley, as an executorand trustee of his estate, and it further stipulated that theinheritance bequeathed to his only child, Lisa Marie Presley, was to beheld in trust and managed on her behalf until she reached age 25. VernonPresley died in 1979, and his own will named three co-executors tosucceed him: National Bank of Commerce; Joseph Hanks, Elvis'accountant, who retired from this post in 1990; and Priscilla BeaulieuPresley, Elvis ex-wife and Lisa Marie's legal guardian. Upon LisaMarie's 25th birthday in 1993, the trust automatically dissolved.Lisa chose to form a new trust, the Elvis Presley Trust, and retain theexecutors to continue management of the estate in the form of a privatebusiness entity known as Elvis Presley Enterprises. Prior to 1993, therewere two dilemmas confronting the executors of the trust. Firstly, therewere a myriad of businesses and individuals who were blatantly usingElvis' name and image for their own profit, without permission ofthe executors of Elvis' estate. The executors wished to unify thedisparate Elvis markets under the name of the estate. Following a numberof successful, precedent-setting court rulings against infringers, theTennessee legislature passed a new law, the Personal Rights ProtectionAct of 1984. (11) This law gave EPE the unqualified right to control theuse of Elvis' name and likeness. Today, as assignee and registrantof all trademarks, copyrights, and publicity rights bel onging to thePresley estate, EPE has more than 110 licenses in operation. (12)

sasha
02-05-2011, 10:26 AM
Sasha no wanna argue with you but what you are write is old, look up google or I find Priss salary increase few mos. ago. And she paid 6 million for Presley name, google it.
And Lisa inherited estate at 30, only part at 25 well documented that.

What you type up there make no mentions of the 6 million which she was paid for and Lisa had to LEGALLY ASKIN the courts to change her name back to maiden Priss did nothing like that. So askin again how she got arounds the divorce decree which DID happens.

I don't take or believe much off the Internet. Especially not from some celebrity magazines, rumors.
I kinda like to ask the ones that were there, like attorneys, see Legal papers, etc. And yes, all the legal papers are old, over 33 years
some. That's when Elvis died and Vernon filed the Will. And 2 years after that, Vernon's death .Lisa chose to not "inherit" until she was older . That's been a few years ago too. Anyone can believe what they want. It's a free world......so far...:} Just hate to see words put in peoples mouths they never said. Have a nice day. I don't argue or get mad. Just like to find the truth in all things.

KPM
02-07-2011, 02:54 PM
She is not being paid for her name-she is being paid as a "consultant"
Also depending on how the exact language of the divorce decree is worded-the part which bars her from profiting from his name may be null and void after he died. It would specifically have to say something barring her profiting after his death.
But in this case technically she is not being paid for the name-its for consulting on matters of EPE.

KPM
02-07-2011, 03:06 PM
Sasha no wanna argue with you but what you are write is old, look up google or I find Priss salary increase few mos. ago. And she paid 6 million for Presley name, google it.
And Lisa inherited estate at 30, only part at 25 well documented that.

What you type up there make no mentions of the 6 million which she was paid for and Lisa had to LEGALLY ASKIN the courts to change her name back to maiden Priss did nothing like that. So askin again how she got arounds the divorce decree which DID happens.
Lisa is the only person who can authorise the use of the Presley name in connection with her father.
The whole deal with Sillerman was for the rights to the likeness and image of Elvis Presley.
His name is in that deal, Priscilla could not sell that name-only Lisa who is the sole heir of Elvis named in his will.
Lisa made the deal and part of that deal (which Lisa agreed to) is that Priscilla is paid to consult on matters for EPE-she gets a salary for doing so.
Lisa at age 25 (the age specified in Elvis's will to hand over to her the estate) decided to start a new trust and in that new trust she left the 3 co-exectutors in charge .......this was her decision and her right as the sole heir.