View Full Version : Pricilla promoting Elvis
MissyM
10-06-2007, 05:29 AM
Why do you think she is so involved in promoting Elvis? I know it was the 30th anniversary and all but something is just stuck in my head. First Lisa sells 85% of EPE. Then she goes on Howard Stern,then Elvis by the Presley's (that one makes me laugh), and then all the other stuff. Do you think it was just the anniversary or that she has some kind of agreement with EPE?
ksimms2
10-06-2007, 07:44 AM
Okay...this thread is also going to turn ugyl, because there are Priscilla lovers and Priscilla haters. Me, personally, I'm neither. I respect her as his ex wife and mother of his child. But honestly, I think it has more to do with $$ than anything else. I think also it has to do with her being in the spotlight. Because honestly, when is she other than Elvis' birthday or anniversary of his death? That's my opinion. (please don't shoot me)
presley31
10-06-2007, 07:48 AM
I do know priscilla likes the money,but l really don't know what to think about the other moments when she talking about elvis except when his birthday and etc are on. I don't have nothing bad to say about priscilla, but sometimes i feel she over does it sometimes.
Diane
10-06-2007, 07:48 AM
No bullets from me Kelly, I agree with you completely. :)
Diane
franny
10-06-2007, 07:51 AM
Maybe, Lisa doesn't want to be the one to do it! Who else should do the "promoting"? If Priscilla is the one asked, then maybe that's why she does it?
Who doesn't like money? :lol:
franny
JoelD
10-06-2007, 08:12 AM
Well IMO Lisa Marie does not want to be compared to her father. Look she sold 85% of EPE then went on Howard Stern show and everytime when she was ask a question about her father she did not want to talk about him. It's like she dis-owns him.
ricardo b. prospero
10-06-2007, 08:56 AM
THe mother and daughter team is a great wrecking crew. Never in my life did I believe Priscilla cared for Elvis. Her relationship and eventual marriage to Elvis seems circumstancial in nature that expectedly could not last. After Elvis death, Priscilla started actively participating in running the business perfectly disguised as honest crusade to keep the legacy of Elvis alive. A perfect tandem indeed that successfully capitalized on Elvis name.I never trust both of them and I need not explain why, I hope all of us can read between lines. A perfect song of Elvis that describe them is "You're a devil in disguise"
Burning_Love
10-06-2007, 09:44 AM
Kelly, you hit the nail on the head. I agree with you (y)(y)
Diane
10-06-2007, 09:47 AM
I honestly wish Lisa had taken the reins when she came of age instead of letting her mother keep them but she is very much her father's daughter in that way. It's easier for her to let Priscilla do it just the way it was for Elvis to leave everything in the Colonel's hands.
Diane
ksimms2
10-06-2007, 09:48 AM
Kelly, you hit the nail on the head. I agree with you (y)(y)
Thanks Danielle!!!
presley31
10-06-2007, 11:16 AM
I honestly wish Lisa had taken the reins when she came of age instead of letting her mother keep them but she is very much her father's daughter in that way. It's easier for her to let Priscilla do it just the way it was for Elvis to leave everything in the Colonel's hands.
Diane
agreed diane l do believe that Lisa knew what she was doing by letting her mother carry on with things.
marina
10-06-2007, 04:37 PM
Elvis is Priscilla's only claim to fame, its not like she is a great actress or singer or has done anything in her life outside of the Elvis world, so this is it and she knows it, she keeps using the excuse that she's doing all of this to keep his name alive because of a new generation, crapp, she is doing it for herself, its very sad that at 62 years old she is still holding on to him, because she knows that without Elvis, her life would have been very different. I really don't mind Priscilla, she has been to Australia a few times, but what I do remember is when she came out in the 80's and 90's anyone interviewing her was told not allowed to ask her any questions about Elvis...and to be honest that's all we wanted to know about, not about her, but when she had to promote something like Elvis by the Presleys (which should've been called Elvis by the Beaulieu's ) (why was Jerry Schilling on that?)
she was really happy to talk about him.....Unfortunately without Elvis and without her having to promote something to do with him, she would't get her name in lights so to speak.
MissyM
10-06-2007, 05:07 PM
See that is what I can not understand. She left because she didn't want her identity wrapped up in Elvis. Now it is as if she has dove head long into that identity?? And she has never had to, nor does she now, have to be in the forefront to promote Elvis (or run things for Lisa). As always the man is and will always be legacy. And she hasn't anything to do with that. (past or present)
presley31
10-06-2007, 05:20 PM
I love the elvis by the presleys and other stuff she came up with, but l think she needs to step down out of the spotlight. i'am not putting her down but she wasn't there in the last years and the ones who were doesn't seem to get noticed as much. Pasty for example l would liked to hear her thoughts and etc.
marina
10-06-2007, 05:40 PM
She certainly has total control, (why wasn't Billy Smith in Elvis by the Presley's?) he was really close to Elvis. Personally I think she should stop and get some dignity...
presley31
10-06-2007, 05:42 PM
She certainly has total control, (why wasn't Billy Smith in Elvis by the Presley's?) he was really close to Elvis. Personally I think she should stop and get some dignity...
dunno about that one:hmm: maybe lisa didn't want billy in it.
It seems to me that the new 85% owner Mr Sillerman must have wanted Priscilla involved-or she would not have been. He would have wuite a bit of say so it seems. Also the 25th anniversay she was also heavily involved(right or wrong depending on how you view her)
ricardo b. prospero
10-07-2007, 03:46 AM
MARINA you said it right, Priscilla is a devil in disguise.He is just too good to be true.
Getlo
10-07-2007, 04:05 AM
Elvis by the Presleys (which should've been called Elvis by the Beaulieu's ) (why was Jerry Schilling on that?)
Jerry's been in Cilla's pocket for years, and she knows he's not one to "rock the boat". He's a safe choice when it comes to specials, promotions etc.
As for Cilla ... it's all about money and prolonging her own brand of "fame". Nothing more, nothing else.
Burning_Love
10-07-2007, 08:49 AM
Marina, your very right, it should have been called 'Elvis By the Beaulieus' Because the only people who were related to Elvis was Lisa and Patsy, they should have had more relatives, like some more of his cousins, so we got a story from the family. But i enjoyed all the footage !
(sorry Jen to be off topic ;))
presley31
10-07-2007, 08:50 AM
It seems to me that the new 85% owner Mr Sillerman must have wanted Priscilla involved-or she would not have been. He would have wuite a bit of say so it seems. Also the 25th anniversay she was also heavily involved(right or wrong depending on how you view her)
l agree KPM(y)
riley
10-08-2007, 04:57 AM
Lisa is now old enough to take full control.
Either she doesn't want that or either Pris wants to stay still the number one first Lady
cameron
10-08-2007, 05:25 AM
I'm no fan of Priscilla's but think about it.
IF Priscilla had NOT become involved and opened Graceland; it would all have been gone many years ago.
I don't know her reasons now, but I agree that IF Sillerman had NOT wanted her there; she would NOT be there now.
Agree that prices have gotten much too high and many fans would not be able to afford the prices. Elvis is a commodity ; to be bought and sold to the highest bidder. :'( It's not a nice thought; but it's the truth.
Priscilla will be gone eventually ; I wonder what some will think when that happens. :hmm: I don't think Lisa seems too interested. IMO.
MissyM
10-08-2007, 05:53 AM
There seems to be something missing when people talk about Graceland having to be opened. There was an option that few people want to talk about. Disolve the estate, pay off all debts, invest it wisely. Someone put an article on here about all of the things in storage. Boxes and boxes full of it, a wearhouse full. Elvis's orginal piano is just now being sold. Pricilla had bought him a new one, the original one was in the basement. Why Lisa would sell it now is beyond my thinking. This is done often when someone passes. If you read Elvis's will he put in guidelines for this and the monies that may come from it. After he died a relative had a medalion Elvis had given her. He gave her a few momentoes. The one she had was a gife from one of the Hotels he played at. He always got stuff like that everytime he played. At the time, and mind you it was about 25 years ago, that one token was sold for a nice amount of money. Have you seen the inventory list. If not there is a link I could find again. So, there would have been more than enough money if that avenue was taken. So then one must ask, why was it not taken???
cameron
10-08-2007, 06:09 AM
There seems to be something missing when people talk about Graceland having to be opened. There was an option that few people want to talk about. Disolve the estate, pay off all debts, invest it wisely. Someone put an article on here about all of the things in storage. Boxes and boxes full of it, a wearhouse full. Elvis's orginal piano is just now being sold. Pricilla had bought him a new one, the original one was in the basement. Why Lisa would sell it now is beyond my thinking. This is done often when someone passes. If you read Elvis's will he put in guidelines for this and the monies that may come from it. After he died a relative had a medalion Elvis had given her. He gave her a few momentoes. The one she had was a gife from one of the Hotels he played at. He always got stuff like that everytime he played. At the time, and mind you it was about 25 years ago, that one token was sold for a nice amount of money. Have you seen the inventory list. If not there is a link I could find again. So, there would have been more than enough money if that avenue was taken. So then one must ask, why was it not taken???
I've thought about that. Why didn't Priscilla just sell everything and end it after Vernon died? Guess we'd have to ask her .
No one seems inclined to ask her that question.
Now, of course, Graceland is a National Archive ;as such it is protected.
It will be around as long as there are people that visit.
Getlo
10-08-2007, 06:11 AM
IF Priscilla had NOT become involved and opened Graceland; it would all have been gone many years ago.
As was discussed at length on another thread (can't remember which) there is no way that Graceland would have just "gone" had it not been opened to the public.
It would still be standing strong and tall exactly where it remains today.
And as a few have suggested on here, one day it should be closed to public visits (save perhaps for the Candlelight Vigil) to finally give Elvis the rest he surely deserves.
Going inside Graceland is a privilege for the fans ... not our right.
cameron
10-08-2007, 06:23 AM
As was discussed at length on another thread (can't remember which) there is no way that Graceland would have just "gone" had it not been opened to the public.
It would still be standing strong and tall exactly where it remains today.
And as a few have suggested on here, one day it should be closed to public visits (save perhaps for the Candlelight Vigil) to finally give Elvis the rest he surely deserves.
Going inside Graceland is a privilege for the fans ... not our right.
Thanks for your opinion. But, according to EP's will it could have all been sold if that's what the executors wanted to do.
I'm not sure why it wasn't.
Priscilla became one of the executors because of Vernon and being Lisa's guardian.
Maybe someone should just ask her instead of us speculating .
I only know that 3 years ago the house and the neighborhood was in a bad state . It made me sad to see it that way and I wondered then why no one kept it repaired.
I hadn't been back to Graceland since before Elvis died until 3 years ago.
I decided to wait another twenty some years before I returned. :'(
MissyM
10-08-2007, 06:38 AM
The reason seems plain as the nose on my face. Graceland and it's effects were worth more open than closed. (long term) This is what I think Elvis intended. He could not foresee it being opened to the public. Lord have mercy, Graceland was a gift to his parents in a big way, it was his oasis from the world he found difficult to deal with, it was a sanctuary. It was where all things sacred were celebrated. (holidays and family) It was were his heart and soul lived. He must have however forseen the possiblity of it having to be sold along with his effects, otherwise it would not have been in his will. He meant to provide well for Lisa, not make her a multi-millionaire along with Cilla! And Vernon was sick and swayed by Pricilla, do you honestly think he would have foreseen Gladys home being trapsed around in and gawked at by the public??? No way, no way!
Part of me is glad the fans get to see it, with all my logic,and spirit, I do not think Elvis, Vernon or Gladys would have wanted that. Vernon was naive about Cilla, weak when it came to women, and to sick. I rather doubt the possiblity ever crossed his mind. I wish I was a fly on the wall when they had conversations. How much you want to bet she made a whole lot of promises she never kept.
Getlo
10-08-2007, 06:43 AM
according to EP's will it could have all been sold if that's what the executors wanted to do. (
I am perfectly aware of what was in Elvis' will. And this has nothing to do with whether Graceland would still exist had it not been opened to the public.
No one in their right mind would have bulldozed it, or destroyed it. Not the executors, not Memphis, no one.
cameron
10-08-2007, 06:59 AM
Missy:
A part of me is glad also that the fans get to "see Graceland."
Yet, on the other hand..I too shrink at the idea of everyone traipsing through his "home." Maybe it's why I stayed away so long. It felt as though I was trespassing. I guess everyone has different feelings on that.
I decided to sell my house. My youngest daughter has decided to buy it.
Never thought about any of my kids wanting it. It has caused some strained relations between my kids. But, it's her that doesn't want to "let it go."
{Her words, not mine.;) } She can remember all the kids that grew up here and wants to keep those memories in tact. I'm nobody nearly as important as EP. But, I guess her memories of all being here are.
cameron
10-08-2007, 07:04 AM
I am perfectly aware of what was in Elvis' will. And this has nothing to do with whether Graceland would still exist had it not been opened to the public.
No one in their right mind would have bulldozed it, or destroyed it. Not the executors, not Memphis, no one.
Elvis was not as important as he is today,IMO.
His name is worth more money today than it ever was.
No one said they'd be "in their right mind."
But, the estate was very short of money then or so I've heard.
I wasn't there. It would have been an easy way out for Priscilla.
MissyM
10-08-2007, 07:05 AM
I've always had mixed feeling on it too. We are planning on visiting the area and seeing the family. You know our family is Elvis's right. And hubs spent time on Graceland as a kid. So last night I asked if he wanted to go see it again. He said no, not like it is now. We decided to go past it and he could tell our sons about it, little things like where they played and stuff like that. But what's done is done. It will never be the same, I don't think.
cameron
10-08-2007, 07:15 AM
I've always had mixed feeling on it too. We are planning on visiting the area and seeing the family. You know our family is Elvis's right. And hubs spent time on Graceland as a kid. So last night I asked if he wanted to go see it again. He said no, not like it is now. We decided to go past it and he could tell our sons about it, little things like where they played and stuff like that. But what's done is done. It will never be the same, I don't think.
I can see his reasons on that. I can remember going past my old home as a kid and it brings back memories. Those were happier times. :)
I guess the time comes when it's time to let things from the past go.
Graceland and even Elvis, will never be the same, IMO.
I just enjoy his music he gave us and the good times now.
MissyM
10-08-2007, 07:18 AM
Yep, take the good memories and cherish them try to let go. Sometimes a challenge.
suspicious_mind
10-08-2007, 01:04 PM
Its really too bad Elvis didnt live long enough to say publicly what he thought about some things...some people...including Priscilla.
Can anyone imagine how it would be to have ur ex husband/wife take over everything and make money off ur name?
Its just wrong what Priscilla is doing, in my opinion.
She shouldve at least been the ONE person that knew him that didnt just care about his money...but shes prooving each year she isnt.
There seems to be something missing when people talk about Graceland having to be opened. There was an option that few people want to talk about. Disolve the estate, pay off all debts, invest it wisely. Someone put an article on here about all of the things in storage. Boxes and boxes full of it, a wearhouse full. Elvis's orginal piano is just now being sold. Pricilla had bought him a new one, the original one was in the basement. Why Lisa would sell it now is beyond my thinking. This is done often when someone passes. If you read Elvis's will he put in guidelines for this and the monies that may come from it. After he died a relative had a medalion Elvis had given her. He gave her a few momentoes. The one she had was a gife from one of the Hotels he played at. He always got stuff like that everytime he played. At the time, and mind you it was about 25 years ago, that one token was sold for a nice amount of money. Have you seen the inventory list. If not there is a link I could find again. So, there would have been more than enough money if that avenue was taken. So then one must ask, why was it not taken???
I think the idea of "dissolving the estate" would have been an even worse ending to Elvis story. Graceland was part of the estate-big part. How sad would it seem to see an auction on the front lawn of Graceland- selling Elvis's things from a point of weakness-which is what selling an estate in this way is. The difference now is Lisa herself can decide what is sold and what is kept-what she wants and what she does'nt. Thats her right shes his daughter. I would not want my kids second guessed on what they do with my stuff when I'm gone-I leave it to them they know what is important to them.
Lisa is probably worth 100 million easy with 15% of whatever Sillerman makes each year and she still owns all of Graceland and all his personal property. Could selling off his estate instead of doing what was done have guaranteed her and her kids that kind of return and security-doubtful. It does not bother me what she does-its hers. IMO
ksimms2
10-08-2007, 01:16 PM
I've always had mixed feeling on it too. We are planning on visiting the area and seeing the family. You know our family is Elvis's right. And hubs spent time on Graceland as a kid. So last night I asked if he wanted to go see it again. He said no, not like it is now. We decided to go past it and he could tell our sons about it, little things like where they played and stuff like that. But what's done is done. It will never be the same, I don't think.
No Missy I didn't know your husband was a relative of Elvis....you never really said, other than you knew Billy Smith.....how are they related? I'm sure you dont want to give out too much detail, but can you tell us how they are related? That is why I like when you post because you seem to know "inside" stuff.....
cameron
10-08-2007, 02:00 PM
I think the idea of "dissolving the estate" would have been an even worse ending to Elvis story. Graceland was part of the estate-big part. How sad would it seem to see an auction on the front lawn of Graceland- selling Elvis's things from a point of weakness-which is what selling an estate in this way is. The difference now is Lisa herself can decide what is sold and what is kept-what she wants and what she does'nt. Thats her right shes his daughter. I would not want my kids second guessed on what they do with my stuff when I'm gone-I leave it to them they know what is important to them.
Lisa is probably worth 100 million easy with 15% of whatever Sillerman makes each year and she still owns all of Graceland and all his personal property. Could selling off his estate instead of doing what was done have guaranteed her and her kids that kind of return and security-doubtful. It does not bother me what she does-its hers. IMO
It seems we're mostly always in agreement. :)
As I've said; I'm not crazy about Priscilla.
Had she NOT opened Graceland when she did I believe it would have been gone. No one had that kind of money to keep the place up.
Grandma Minnie lived there then as well as the "fiesty aunt."
I can remember the talk about Minnie having to stay in her bedroom when the tours started. Technically, I guess it couldn't be sold until Minnie died.
Priscilla found Soden in K.C. Mo. to help her get all that started.
In the long run, I guess she did the best she could at that time.
The fans profited by getting to see Graceland and still do.
I guess you don't have to go to the more expensive things they offer .
I did see more reasonable entertainment going on this year.
All in all; I give Priscilla credit for Graceland still being here .
It's really up to Lisa now.
MissyM
10-08-2007, 05:58 PM
Ksimms, you have my e-mail address. (if want to ask more) I won't be specific in a post. My husband is Billy Smith's cousin. We aren't related to Elvis directly. But I know alot. My husband was born in Memphis. I never intended to give to much info. But when things are said, I have to counter them with what I know. Where is that Getlo. I've been waiting for him to ask for my "credentials". LOL Just kidding Getlo, I like your posts. And I do understand.
Oh and I forgot, I honestly try to see things from the fans point. I was one before I was married. But I can't break from the connection completely. And believe me, sometimes being objective is hard!!!!!!!
Elvis is Priscilla's only claim to fame, its not like she is a great actress or singer or has done anything in her life outside of the Elvis world, so this is it and she knows it, she keeps using the excuse that she's doing all of this to keep his name alive because of a new generation, crapp, she is doing it for herself, its very sad that at 62 years old she is still holding on to him, because she knows that without Elvis, her life would have been very different. I really don't mind Priscilla, she has been to Australia a few times, but what I do remember is when she came out in the 80's and 90's anyone interviewing her was told not allowed to ask her any questions about Elvis...and to be honest that's all we wanted to know about, not about her, but when she had to promote something like Elvis by the Presleys (which should've been called Elvis by the Beaulieu's ) (why was Jerry Schilling on that?)
she was really happy to talk about him.....Unfortunately without Elvis and without her having to promote something to do with him, she would't get her name in lights so to speak.
Yes, that is very well written. I also wondered why it was called "Elvis By The Presleys" - there were only two Presleys (Patsy & Lisa)
presley31
10-09-2007, 07:54 AM
It seems we're mostly always in agreement. :)
As I've said; I'm not crazy about Priscilla.
Had she NOT opened Graceland when she did I believe it would have been gone. No one had that kind of money to keep the place up.
Grandma Minnie lived there then as well as the "fiesty aunt."
I can remember the talk about Minnie having to stay in her bedroom when the tours started. Technically, I guess it couldn't be sold until Minnie died.
Priscilla found Soden in K.C. Mo. to help her get all that started.
In the long run, I guess she did the best she could at that time.
The fans profited by getting to see Graceland and still do.
I guess you don't have to go to the more expensive things they offer .
I did see more reasonable entertainment going on this year.
All in all; I give Priscilla credit for Graceland still being here .
It's really up to Lisa now.
l agree (y)
Ksimms, you have my e-mail address. (if want to ask more) I won't be specific in a post. My husband is Billy Smith's cousin. We aren't related to Elvis directly. But I know alot. My husband was born in Memphis. I never intended to give to much info. But when things are said, I have to counter them with what I know. Where is that Getlo. I've been waiting for him to ask for my "credentials". LOL Just kidding Getlo, I like your posts. And I do understand.
Oh and I forgot, I honestly try to see things from the fans point. I was one before I was married. But I can't break from the connection completely. And believe me, sometimes being objective is hard!!!!!!!
Im confused :blush: - if your husband is Billy Smith's cousin - doesnt that automatically make him Elvis' cousin too?
Billy Smith is the son of Gladys' brother - hence him and Elvis are cousins...
Donut
10-09-2007, 08:20 AM
Never had the impression that Prsicilla was promoting Elvis. I see like she has been promoting her family bussines and herself.
MissyM
10-09-2007, 08:28 AM
Couldn't have said it better. I just read an article where she defends selling the 85 percent. Hey, it wasn't her 85 % to sell. What does that say????
presley31
10-09-2007, 08:29 AM
Couldn't have said it better. I just read an article where she defends selling the 85 percent. Hey, it wasn't her 85 % to sell. What does that say????
wasn't it lisa who sold the 85 percent?
Dovey
10-09-2007, 08:31 AM
Never had the impression that Prsicilla was promoting Elvis. I see like she has been promoting her family bussines and herself.
(y)(y)Yes Donut, that is my take on her too $$$$$$$ Dovey;)
presley31
10-09-2007, 08:35 AM
http://www.elvis.com.au/presley/lisa_marie_on_estate_sale.shtml
something about the selling
MissyM
10-09-2007, 08:47 AM
"Would he have wanted me to do the best thing for the future, for expanding the estate, for protecting his family?" she asks. "The answer would have been 'Hell, yes.'"
_________________________
I don't even know what to say about that statement. The women doesn't even know who her father was if she can say that. Protect his family!!! Can someone please explain that to me????
ms_epblvd
10-09-2007, 10:28 AM
Well Priscilla DEFINATELY continues to promote Elvis NOT out of love but that is her retirement. It has nothing to do with like or disliking her or her loving or not loving Elvis. She is a business woman and won the lottery when she met the king!!(y)
Diane
10-09-2007, 10:43 AM
Oh yeah!(y)
Diane
presley31
10-09-2007, 10:52 AM
Well Priscilla DEFINATELY continues to promote Elvis NOT out of love but that is her retirement. It has nothing to do with like or disliking her or her loving or not loving Elvis. She is a business woman and won the lottery when she met the king!!(y)
yes priscilla is in it for the money, but l think to cause lisa won't take over.
Diane
10-09-2007, 02:30 PM
I agree Jen, I wish she would. That's what Elvis wanted.
Diane
presley31
10-09-2007, 02:48 PM
yep diane
I really can't see why Lisa won't stand up and take her place and let her mother stand down. Elvis would want lisa to stand up and make choices for her future and also's graceland. If she's not in control, how would she show her kids how to handle things when she is not here anymore.
MissyM
10-09-2007, 04:33 PM
Excellent point Presley31.
Diane
10-09-2007, 04:47 PM
Well it has to be one or two things. either Lisa does not want control or her mother won't relinquish it.
Diane
I think, Jen, Lisa sees her father as a father, she doesn't want anything to do with the financial side of it, but someone's gotta do it for her and that is Cilla. This is the impression I got through the years
Jumpsuit Junkie
10-09-2007, 05:00 PM
Graceland was never, ever going to be sold to an outsider, the natural decision was made and it didn't take the brains of a rocking horse to get to that decision. Priscilla was ONE of the executors ONE, she seems to get the credit for making a momentous decision, this just isn't the case :mad: basically the fact Elvis was dead did not stop them from making a business case to sell the BRAND Elvis Presley with Graceland being the centre of the attraction. With Elvis' fan base it was destined to be a success, although I don't doubt there were reservations about the Image problem from 1975-77!! They have more than made up for this over the last three decades almost totally eradicating any pictures or discussion from this time period from their database.
Dissolving the estate would have been a huge mistake, the amount made would have been small potatoes in comparison to the long term decision to open Graceland to the public, the fact that this option was in Elvis' will would have been a formality, as most wills have the same basic elements especially for the rich and famous.
yep diane
I really can't see why Lisa won't stand up and take her place and let her mother stand down. Elvis would want lisa to stand up and make choices for her future and also's graceland. If she's not in control, how would she show her kids how to handle things when she is not here anymore.
Nothing says in stone she ever has to fully take control of the estate. Some people are not "business savy" and no amount of pushing ever gets them that way. I'm sure if something is in the works she doesn't like-she lets people know it (she does not seem to be shy about voicing her opinions) If she never takes full control of the business end of it, so what? IMO. Thats why you have accountants, lawyers, consultants, etc...The trick I think is getting people you can trust to "not line their pockets at your expense." Same with her kids-they need never be in control of the operation other than in name.
I think the rub with some is not that Lisa has not taken control-but that her mom seems to be one of the ones in control.
Graceland was never, ever going to be sold to an outsider, the natural decision was made and it didn't take the brains of a rocking horse to get to that decision. Priscilla was ONE of the executors ONE, she seems to get the credit for making a momentous decision, this just isn't the case :mad: basically the fact Elvis was dead did not stop them from making a business case to sell the BRAND Elvis Presley with Graceland being the centre of the attraction. With Elvis' fan base it was destined to be a success, although I don't doubt there were reservations about the Image problem from 1975-77!! They have more than made up for this over the last three decades almost totally eradicating any pictures or discussion from this time period from their database.
Dissolving the estate would have been a huge mistake, the amount made would have been small potatoes in comparison to the long term decision to open Graceland to the public, the fact that this option was in Elvis' will would have been a formality, as most wills have the same basic elements especially for the rich and famous.
Spot on agree!(y)
MissyM
10-09-2007, 06:01 PM
It would not have been small potatoes at all. It would have been a large bushel of potatoes. And the other Executors would have made sure it got invested wisely, I am quite sure. By the time Lisa turned the age where she would get it, it prob. would have doubled. And anyway, what is wrong with a large bushel? Oh wait, Pricilla didn't want to settle for that. Let us not forget that her acting career and modeling income was prob. not that substantial. She had basically lived off of her settlement and child support for years. Once dead, that cash cow was gone. Since the estate had a cash flow problem, she was getting zip.
It's weird because if there is a wearhouse full of memorabilia, people seem to think it would not have added up to much. I don't get that.
Here is a book I'd love to order if it is still in print.
http://www.aksi.net/rjay/
cprimm
10-09-2007, 08:58 PM
I personally feel that Lisa does not want to run the business. She wants to have a life of her own and let her mother deal with all the business. She wants her own career and do what she wants to do, rather than what would be involved in the business side of things. I thought maybe this year she had "softened" toward her father's fans and would take more interest in the legacy of her father. She knows that her mother will "TCB" and she can live her own life.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.